From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jul 10 05:47:41 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzvAW-0006QO-JO for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:47:20 -0700 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.182]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1FzvAV-0006QE-FT for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:47:20 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id i49so1213922pyi for ; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:47:18 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OuzrwjXOY7rKjMmtRr7h65zSyqMpgdrj8ouTMmwwvCRMtwc/J9tW9rqkhlbX1ULcKyu2XBHMV89iJFiKsnje+BH1zUy+FDk1N3y0aGxmriPagpdwk2+6p3j6Odb7cvlfMV8vQGbCbH5z7cvI7Mdueam8If6aMt/EAYXt0f8Ko3Q= Received: by 10.35.132.13 with SMTP id j13mr3129210pyn; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.14.17 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Jul 2006 05:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560607100547t4c0be774o56f69f3c5f3b8467@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 09:47:18 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: ZOI and culture neutrality In-Reply-To: <44B1F177.30105@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44AF0325.2070709@gmail.com> <44AFD504.5090902@gmail.com> <925d17560607080924y2ff442bcqa6bddada11785a33@mail.gmail.com> <44B064B6.2000102@gmail.com> <925d17560607090642j320d13dcj98b78b6bf9408b5a@mail.gmail.com> <44B14F3B.4040308@gmail.com> <925d17560607091340r4ce6e7c9u5b9867fe22f73e6e@mail.gmail.com> <44B1F177.30105@gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-archive-position: 12060 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 7/10/06, Hugh O'Byrne wrote: > > As for the deeper point: perhaps I underestimated the size of the Lojban > community, and the range and depth of expertise that comes from a larger > population. (Did you mean "overestimated"?) Perhaps this is the source of some misunderstandings. The way you presented things, you seemed to be addressing not the Lojban community in general but the LLG in particular. You can read about the LLG here: Speaking for myself, I don't think the LLG would have anything to say about a phonetic alphabet. But if Lojbanists interested in phonetics want to design a phonetic alphabet or adopt an already existing one for use in Lojban, I don't see any problem with that. > I'm a bit confused now; you indicated in another post that at least some > responsibility has been passed from the LLG to the BPFK... which is which? The BPFK is commissioned by the LLG to handle some language design issues. See: mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.