From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Aug 14 06:33:11 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GCcYl-0005NE-NO for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:32:51 -0700 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GCcYj-0005N6-6v for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:32:51 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id a27so66803nfc for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:32:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=F+uNX/TPy9GvoaHYzDLBnXJe+gkhujREp+JwDhytdaF5qlN93HrtT7s83uRoCjJrKFD/9D//JSYHqyMtd24euouE5K/7ams49Ctv6Hv6D2abAXnJva4g5QOkCxMgEpm1qvjDg5Lnf7NduVsPI0eX6WH++I9cOwK72I8NLjRVnL0= Received: by 10.82.140.15 with SMTP id n15mr488715bud; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.82.138.15 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4c4e58c10608140632r331c3cdbuc16dd81efe08be4a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 14:32:44 +0100 From: "Evgeny Sklyanin" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: finpe In-Reply-To: <269244206.20060814190821@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_9728_26110396.1155562364001" References: <269244206.20060814190821@mail.ru> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 12448 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: eks2005@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_9728_26110396.1155562364001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 8/14/06, Yanis Batura wrote: > Does it say here that sharks are not fishes? AFAIK, sharks *are* fishes, > at least according to Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shark > > > Maybe whales were intended to be there? Whales, indeed, are not fishes > The authors probably meant that sharks are not "proper", or bony fishes. mi'e .evgenis. ------=_Part_9728_26110396.1155562364001 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline

On 8/14/06, Yanis Batura <ybatura@mail.ru> wrote:

Does it say here that sharks are not fishes? AFAIK, sharks *are* fishes, at least according to Wikipedia:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shark


Maybe whales were intended to be there? Whales, indeed, are not fishes

The authors probably meant that sharks are not "proper", or bony fishes.

mi'e .evgenis.

 

------=_Part_9728_26110396.1155562364001-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.