From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Sep 24 23:18:21 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:18:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRjmz-0006Do-SL for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:18:01 -0700 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.183]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRjmy-0006DY-Vi for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:18:01 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id i49so2003368pyi for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:18:00 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:in-reply-to:thread-index:x-mimeole:message-id; b=kTB1fX3VYMoVzzudS2GDaQYhCFS7YFayClNMXA1Yob2QqEww6Nkb8+upMKsVgwylE4ndH390MohixUPuOBgL1E5gCMfOEJLlHwU2DUM51eqJg7EvE66gIOjlgqv2rHkhizjJL9e2ilAYLBs5uk+5PLOW8xcOCRRxaiP09Yyg+wo= Received: by 10.65.235.7 with SMTP id m7mr569116qbr; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:17:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blackbeast ( [67.165.223.114]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e15sm1953758qbe.2006.09.24.23.17.58; Sun, 24 Sep 2006 23:17:58 -0700 (PDT) From: "M@" To: Subject: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited for human-computer interaction.2 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:19:13 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <87wt7s336h.fsf@gmail.com> Thread-Index: AcbgZtypobwRevgLQUunzO/lcQgSQQAAorDg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Message-ID: <45177496.20855687.6bcd.ffffaabd@mx.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-archive-position: 12626 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matthew.dunlap@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Depending on which of the half dozen computer related PIM acronyms you meant IL is one of the biggest and most well known examples of one. I suspect you meant Platform Independent Model, which is exactly what .NET is, except instead of using lojban as the interaction language it uses practically any programming language that then compile to IL (Intermediate Language) which acts as the interface between functions. --M@ > -----Original Message----- > From: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org [mailto:lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org] > On Behalf Of Timothy Hobbs > Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 11:51 PM > To: lojban-list@lojban.org > Subject: [lojban] Re: my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well > suited for human-computer interaction.2 > > imagin a pim, wich you interacted with in lojban. > > what does lojban have to do with IL? > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.