From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Sep 25 04:39:51 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRomw-0006vJ-9m for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:38:26 -0700 Received: from imo-m21.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.2]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GRomW-0006uu-PA for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 04:38:04 -0700 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-m21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id d.c47.3c1cadd (62952) for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:37:47 -0400 (EDT) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 07:37:47 EDT Subject: [lojban] binary vs. digital To: lojban-list@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_c47.3c1cadd.3249198b_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 11501 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) X-archive-position: 12630 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --part1_c47.3c1cadd.3249198b_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/25/2006 4:22:37 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > From: "M@" > Subject: [lojban] my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suited > for h > Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:24:17 -0600 > > ... > Computers are both digital and binary (note: I distinguish digital from > binary, some people disagree, but that's another argument altogether (and > yes I'm aware that binary implies digital, that phrase is foreshadowing)), > What distinction are you making between binary and digital? stevo --part1_c47.3c1cadd.3249198b_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 9/25/2006 4:22:37 AM Cent= ral Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


From: "M@" <matthew.dunl= ap@gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban] my opinion on why lojban isn't specifically well suite= d for h
Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:24:17 -0600

...
Computers are both digital and binary (note: I distinguish digital from
binary, some people disagree, but that's another argument altogether (an= d
yes I'm aware that binary implies digital, that phrase is foreshadowing)= ),


What distinction are you making between binary and digital?  

stevo --part1_c47.3c1cadd.3249198b_boundary-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.