From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Oct 02 07:18:10 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:18:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GUObf-00008r-Di for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:17:23 -0700 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.177]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GUObP-00006C-Ut for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:17:14 -0700 Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id i49so980154pyi for ; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:17:02 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OXwi48uvQM1Lt20mr/ecG6j/HWE/SIZT9whxAgmeGfKOkAeTv34MNRpIZQQwKIkp3GI0woE4rZvKvMn8aUifS3CEQ4T1U5WP7RSawqE9UfoOO2h4S/PLvQCsWJ1rX9Te7KBw0dFIm9JFxVeU9GiSwQISlcj0zCVHlFQo5h8nnUs= Received: by 10.35.97.1 with SMTP id z1mr7561286pyl; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 07:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.10.9 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 07:16:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560610020716p5ea2a82dja1a5309c590c2a2c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:17:01 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: everyday lojban In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <411a52d90610011426p43a359cfqe452abffd2da4aed@mail.gmail.com> <200610011748.05593.phma@phma.optus.nu> <411a52d90610011700t175abbaeidaf4fa66c41ac3bb@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 12669 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 10/2/06, Matt Arnold wrote: > Someone here might be able to correct me, but it seems that every > series of letters that is used as a cmavo (a word) is also used as > rafsi syllable (a prefix or suffix), and all rafsi are also used as > cmavo. (Or almost all.) More or less. Almost all CVV forms are cmavo, but there are a few (13) exceptions, see , and almost all CVV forms are rafsi, but there are many exceptions. For example, "co'o" is not a rafsi because there was no gismu to which it could have been assigned. Of course CCV and CVC rafsi have no similar form cmavo. > When Lojban is spoken properly, the listener > can always tell whether it's being used as a cmavo or rafsi. Yes. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.