From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Oct 02 11:24:26 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GUSSW-00064d-AE for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:24:08 -0700 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GUSST-00064W-G2 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:24:08 -0700 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 23so533078ugr for ; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:24:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Up364sQz+MmFWNEK+3Xn1qGvJ4P5Bat3SWcsaRHNJE2/FcKOLPNcL+TDFhWVDgPhWsgCTSaO8OkO/fa4f2TBpWsGMjf8DC07+UmTc4LEU5ZdOBvxk26oPIZfyH5vaWFJp/2pegMeiHRibUROkvDupF0uSjL/yPNVs+zmrufSHHc= Received: by 10.78.181.13 with SMTP id d13mr3709071huf; Mon, 02 Oct 2006 11:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.144.3 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 14:24:03 -0400 From: "Matt Arnold" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Experimental gismu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) X-archive-position: 12672 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: matt.mattarn@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 10/2/06, Jorge Llambías wrote: > On 10/2/06, Matt Arnold wrote: > > BTW, the chart wouldn't have helped you with {ditcu} if it only > contained official gismu: > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > Aha! I scored it with the assumption it was a mistake, and that the user intended some other gismu. I've often heard unused valid gismu space described as "sacred", "forbidden", and in all other ways inducing the anger of those who are in the know. If I had known the user was intentionally invading it, I would have scored it lower. But in the eyes of the Lojban community, what's the status of "experimental" gismu in actual usage? -epkat To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.