From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Nov 01 02:38:53 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:38:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GfDUM-0007mL-0Q for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:38:30 -0800 Received: from f23.mail.ru ([194.67.57.149]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GfDUH-0007mE-2n for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 02:38:29 -0800 Received: from mail by f23.mail.ru with local id 1GfDUD-000Lf9-00 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:38:21 +0300 Received: from [212.17.0.61] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:38:21 +0300 From: Yanis Batura To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Stress of the penultimate syllable Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: unknown via proxy [212.17.0.61] Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2006 13:38:21 +0300 In-Reply-To: =?windows-1251?Q??= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 12884 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ybatura@mail.ru Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list -----Original Message----- From: "Andrii (lOkadin) Zvorygin" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 05:11:45 -0500 Subject: [lojban] Re: Stress of the penultimate syllable > I suppose undotted gives a shorter text, but much less legible, and since > > raw text is so bandwidth-small to begin with, it's hardly worth the savings. > > But that's really another issue entirely, the transparency of computer file > > formats. Which I'd gladly go into, but I don't think we need to subject the > > whole mailing list to. > > > > and I'm planning to create a new development framework promoting the use of > lOjban. Currently working on: > lOjban programming language, planning on having more or less the same > lOjban as we have now, just with reform changes, refer to "reform" mailing > thread. > > will have in future: > fully distributed network (like freenet) to distribute the "functions" > though they will be more like bridi which are explained by lOjban sambau. > ..i.e. fanva da la lOjban la Anglic fu ma, will be a bridi that answers that > question for any da. though you can be more or less specific, creating a > more, or less general function. > > Operating System: the development model will probably be so good and > effective that we will be able to produce at a far greater rate than any > other language, as well taking into account the large amount of AI we will > have built in to the interperter, (simple with the development model to add > specific bridi, into paragraphs that describe the function of other bridi) > with all our users contributing to the knowledge base. > > General AI: what else would you call it? When this system talks back to us > in the same language we talk to it. and can tell us things formated in the > way we like them. perhaps colaborating large amount of sources, and giving > us "notes". Anyways, a long way off, but we'll get there. > > Have to focus on the now, Lojban programming language, based on Prolog. I'll > make a post tommorrow, Hmmmm... how long will it take for your enthusiasm to burn out? mi'e .ianis To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.