From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Nov 01 05:50:11 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 01 Nov 2006 05:50:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GfGTQ-0002Jz-LP for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 05:49:44 -0800 Received: from imo-m18.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.208]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GfGTN-0002Jm-Nt for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 01 Nov 2006 05:49:44 -0800 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-m18.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id d.cfe.a9be08 (29672) for ; Wed, 1 Nov 2006 08:49:39 -0500 (EST) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 08:49:38 EST Subject: [lojban] unnecessary capitalized vowels To: lojban-list@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_cfe.a9be08.3279fff2_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 11501 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.1 (-) X-archive-position: 12886 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --part1_cfe.a9be08.3279fff2_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 11/1/2006 4:22:15 AM Central Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes: > From: "Andrii (lOkadin) Zvorygin" > Subject: [lojban] Re: reform > > Thank you for pointing out the fa fi, inconsitancy. > I'm for removing words, but Not for narrowing the vocabulary. > It's just we have a lot of words, that are just insulting, like cultural > gIsmu. What about the Hungarians? > > On 10/31/06, HeliodoR wrote: > > > > > removal of ambiguous gIsmu [...] > > > > What's the point in removing words and narrowing the vocabulary? > > > > I'm for removing words, but Not for narrowing the vocabulary. > It's just we have a lot of words, that are just insulting, like cultural > gIsmu. What about the Hungarians? > It's not going to narrow your vocabulary to take out synonyms like lOjbo, we > already have la lOjban. no point in having a cultural gIsmu too. Take the > example of sOfto. English doesn't have a verb for every nationality, and I > think you'd be hard pressed to find a language with such an odd concept. > > lOkadin, When you stop capitalizing vowels unnecessarily, I'll start reading your posts again. stevo --part1_cfe.a9be08.3279fff2_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message dated 11/1/2006 4:22:15 AM Cent= ral Standard Time, ecartis@digitalkingdom.org writes:


From: "Andrii (lOkadin) Zvo= rygin" <andrii.z@gmail.com>
Subject: [lojban] Re: reform

Thank you for pointing out the fa fi, inconsitancy.
I'm for removing words, but Not for narrowing the vocabulary.
It's just we have a lot of words, that are just insulting, like cultural
gIsmu. What about the Hungarians?

On 10/31/06, HeliodoR <exitconsole@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > removal of ambiguous gIsmu [...]
>
> What's the point in removing words and narrowing the vocabulary?
>

I'm for removing words, but Not for narrowing the vocabulary.
It's just we have a lot of words, that are just insulting, like cultural
gIsmu. What about the Hungarians?
It's not going to narrow your vocabulary to take out synonyms like lOjbo= , we
already have la lOjban. no point in having a cultural gIsmu too.  T= ake the
example of sOfto. English doesn't have a verb for every nationality, and= I
think you'd be hard pressed to find a language with such an odd concept.



lOkadin,
When you stop capitalizing vowels unnecessarily, I'll start reading your= posts again.  

stevo --part1_cfe.a9be08.3279fff2_boundary-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.