From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Nov 09 23:12:55 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:12:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GiQZ1-0007T2-T0 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:12:36 -0800 Received: from eastrmmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.240.35]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GiQYr-0007Su-LX for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:12:35 -0800 Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao04.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20061110071226.BONM20226.eastrmmtao04.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:12:26 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([72.192.234.183]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id kvBj1V0073y5FKc0000000; Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:11:45 -0500 Message-ID: <455425F0.8070903@lojban.org> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:10:40 -0500 From: Bob LeChevalier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: livejournal discrimination References: <2d3df92a0611061040o5b0781c0o3df414476a3e0b68@mail.gmail.com> <200611081049.40483.colin.wright@denbridgemarine.com> <45533464.7080901@lojban.org> <4553A799.5010907@lojban.org> <20061110061200.GF23121@chain.digitalkingdom.org> In-Reply-To: <20061110061200.GF23121@chain.digitalkingdom.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 13032 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lojbab@lojban.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 09:27:09PM -0500, Hugh O'Byrne wrote: > >>Wow. I spend time addressing point after point, and then find the >>bullseye which makes all the rest irrelavent. >> >>On 11/9/06, Bob LeChevalier wrote: >> >>>If my expressions get people so pissed off at me that they don't >>>want to talk about LOkadin any more, then my purposes will be >>>served. >> >>There you have it, from the horse's mouth, folks. Bob will >>disregard the rules of the language, Not at all. (It is NOT "disregarding the rules of the language" to say that I don't approve of experimentation with disruptive orthographic unconventionality which may be technically permitted but which several have said make the text unreadable, and which offers nothing to make up for this). >> he will even disregard the welfare of this community, Wrong. The welfare of the community lies in common effort, not distractions. >>just so that he can have his way. My way? Not hardly. The community's way. > He said *about*, not *to*. He wants the lokadin discussion to end > because it's pointless, that's all. Thanks, Robin. That is precisely why I have posted. lojbab To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.