From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Nov 13 12:32:45 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:32:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GjiTi-0006kv-HH for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:32:26 -0800 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GjiTa-0006kl-AN for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:32:26 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id c2so1084545ugf for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:32:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=nynFWpwrpY6RB5nwxkhgPLSEZanHZxny4vreQV+Ykd7TLmbVATBBKY+yLRrMpETUwsaT7IhAeWZ3AuTxJQOAMFDE2Y3jHzu/nr40BZwx8KkIjaxKZnjqLoo4QF4mzZh2QCnj6yC+90xM1ZFMQ/0P0f8lKo/nEQqMXJPTpt4Piuk= Received: by 10.78.50.5 with SMTP id x5mr67741hux.1163449931265; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:32:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ( [71.112.110.242]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 37sm8729292hub.2006.11.13.12.32.08; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:32:10 -0800 (PST) From: Timothy Hobbs To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: "la" rule References: <325816428.20061113190842@mail.ru> <20061113171203.GD24729@chain.digitalkingdom.org> <4558B5C3.9020006@kli.org> Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:32:04 -0800 In-Reply-To: <4558B5C3.9020006@kli.org> (Mark E. Shoulson's message of "Mon\, 13 Nov 2006 13\:13\:23 -0500") Message-ID: <87d57rxf3v.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -2.4 (--) X-archive-position: 13099 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: tim.thelion@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Just a thought, but would it be possible to have mandatory terminators at the end of cmene? This terminator would be aloud at any point in the cmene, the disallowed sequence would then be much longer, it would be the terminator plus la, lo, le, ba, cu... any of the sumti or selbri starting sounds. just a thought. To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.