From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Nov 13 16:46:02 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:46:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GjmQd-00044Q-GE for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:45:31 -0800 Received: from smtpout.mac.com ([17.250.248.175]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GjmQY-00044G-FK for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:45:31 -0800 Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout05/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kAE0jPKn022133 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:45:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.33] (bas12-ottawa23-1177806305.dsl.bell.ca [70.51.229.225]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id kAE0jMqV017143 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 16:45:24 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: <4558F37D.9070003@kli.org> References: <20061113204805.48815.qmail@web81309.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <4558E466.80006@lojban.org> <525A773F-A307-43AF-9603-3E18C02C42FA@mac.com> <4558F37D.9070003@kli.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <1C22C212-76D1-47C4-A7B1-F374D9F4637A@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Robert McIvor Subject: [lojban] Re: "la" rule Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:45:21 -0500 To: lojban-list@lojban.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-Brightmail-scanned: yes X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 13119 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rmcivor@mac.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 13 Nov, 2006, at 17:36, Mark E. Shoulson wrote: > Robert McIvor wrote: > >> >> And the rule was altered to cover the LaPlace situation. I believe >> the current solution allows unambiguous parsing of names (in >> Loglan), and has only the restriction that names end with a >> consonant and a pause. > I'm still not fully understanding how the new Loglan rule covers > all cases. What about someone named, say {parmalagan}? Is {la > parmalagan} a single person, or is it {la parma la gan}, two sumti, > the first being LA on a hypothetical predicate {parma}? la parmalagan would be la Parmalagan, because la parma would need to be followed by a pause to be la parma la gan > > ~mark > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list- > request@lojban.org > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, > or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.