From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Nov 18 09:21:37 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:21:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GlTsS-0002sa-4Z for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:21:16 -0800 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GlTsM-0002sK-A1 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:21:15 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so3138842nfb for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:21:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=K+2swFRjCh1DD4pZgJn6xzYjUrQFpXNNmN7zA5us04Pov0JbsoYYqOZbZxAVLYfpM12j8DDoukonQZLLU8PXszC+pxqeYsfo3FARAqfXG+B1HXSBRbaB5BadnXTKy5vrZNKSQg76oZOoB+17W2XFRNoTKnymgaRgerErAWRe8/4= Received: by 10.78.158.11 with SMTP id g11mr3347856hue.1163870468097; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:21:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.131.5 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:21:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:21:07 -0800 From: "Theodore Reed" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: zo'o nai sai In-Reply-To: <20061118090028.eepvzfk39og4kkgk@webmail.pdx.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_15008_896347.1163870467961" References: <20061118090028.eepvzfk39og4kkgk@webmail.pdx.edu> X-Spam-Score: -2.2 (--) X-archive-position: 13198 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: ted.reed@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_15008_896347.1163870467961 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 11/18/06, keppel@pdx.edu wrote: > > .io cai > zoi gy. Quit mucking around with the language. I just read that police are > giving up "ten codes" because they couldn't agree. We need to revere the big > red book, at least in memory of John Cowan. .gy. > What the hell are you talking about? Ten codes? And John Cowan isn't dead. As a member of the bpfk, I can assure you that the "mucking around" isn't done. There is no baseline. The language is not complete. There will be a second edition of the big red book. .e'osai ko na bebna -- Theodore Reed (treed/bancus) www.surreality.us ------=_Part_15008_896347.1163870467961 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 11/18/06, keppel@pdx.edu <keppel@pdx.edu> wrote:
.io cai
zoi gy. Quit mucking around with the language. I just read that police are giving up "ten codes" because they couldn't agree. We need to revere the big red book, at least in memory of John Cowan. .gy.

What the hell are you talking about? Ten codes? And John Cowan isn't dead. As a member of the bpfk, I can assure you that the "mucking around" isn't done. There is no baseline. The language is not complete. There will be a second edition of the big red book.

.e'osai ko na bebna

--
Theodore Reed (treed/bancus)
www.surreality.us ------=_Part_15008_896347.1163870467961-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.