From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Nov 18 14:52:15 2006 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:52:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GlZ2Q-0000lq-6L for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:51:54 -0800 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1GlZ2F-0000lg-OW for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:51:54 -0800 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id c2so859447ugf for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:51:38 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZtfzKOjl6dmYaO8vene5j+EYESq9QByskud0GkYjlcwVoYkgT1S7W4Vqh6Q/G67oqHAkUxGhkXqN/zdyVELnDCvsr2jwct5GlUJBaaUg4G51pUIydl8xq373qponQKYW2p2vmKRsC9fJWfwHIkd6UuFgdaYklLKuoXG2iMdrYQs= Received: by 10.67.21.11 with SMTP id y11mr2272150ugi.1163890297899; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:51:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by null with HTTP; Sat, 18 Nov 2006 14:51:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2006 18:51:37 -0400 From: Betsemes To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: zo'o nai sai In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061118090028.eepvzfk39og4kkgk@webmail.pdx.edu> X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-archive-position: 13200 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: betsemes@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list l think there is a good chance for the eventual dialectification of lojban, since there is some feelings against some of the features and restrictions as well as resistance to change. I think eventually that could happen. On 11/18/06, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Theodore Reed wrote: > > > On 11/18/06, keppel@pdx.edu wrote: > >> > >> .io cai > >> zoi gy. Quit mucking around with the language. I just read that police > are > >> giving up "ten codes" because they couldn't agree. We need to revere the > >> big > >> red book, at least in memory of John Cowan. .gy. > >> > > > > What the hell are you talking about? Ten codes? And John Cowan isn't dead. > > As a member of the bpfk, I can assure you that the "mucking around" isn't > > done. There is no baseline. The language is not complete. There will be a > > second edition of the big red book. > > I presume he is referring to the news item that is commented on in > http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/archives/003771.html . I may be > wrong, but in the context of his expressed dislike of the "la" discussion, > he is probably using the proliferation of conflicting code schemes in the > different police departments as a metaphor of the (perceived) danger of > dialectification of Lojban. > > -- > Arnt Richard Johansen http://arj.nvg.org/ > Jeg har nett, men ikke maskin. Litt rart. > Kanskje jeg ender opp med å sitte i en krok å sutte på > nettverkskabelen. > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > > -- ----------------------------- The one who laughs at what he/she doesn't know is on the way to become an idiot. - Samael Aun Weor ni'au lu da poi ckasu de poi da na slabu ke'a cu ca'o binxo lo tolmencre li'u pe fi'e la samael aun veor To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.