From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jan 03 06:55:35 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:55:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H27WL-0000Do-EE for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:55:13 -0800 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H27WD-0000D1-2W for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:55:10 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so11837266nfb for ; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:55:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=KQyz7r0+GVVzoNMnvk9grm2mHR/I0oX+WYPNfLY979J2/VXe5TqsJRbmwoWZ8uaGITgyVpO8m0yWYPXwH1XjmHzR4y+NgkUwox/gMgvWf0ddO+QXd76eSv4vEJOpHRGdAIVnjol2Q6xrLlJM/epkcieoHFZ20WhR6EyCL1icA6g= Received: by 10.82.152.16 with SMTP id z16mr1694352bud.1167836103490; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:55:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.115.20 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 06:55:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560701030655ia74c764x43fa0448381c7a3f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:55:03 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Military language In-Reply-To: <459BC0B2.3090803@ropine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <000c01c72ee9$d72544b0$6601a8c0@hq.squarei.net> <459BC0B2.3090803@ropine.com> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 X-Spam-Score-Int: -24 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13468 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 1/3/07, Seth Gordon wrote: > M@ wrote: > > > Of course, there can still be misunderstandings, if there is > > interference and the word 'na' doesn't come through out of "ko na daspo > > le ckule" bad things would probably happen. > > Isn't there a standard to always use "NOT REPEAT NOT" in military > telegrams to make sure the reader doesn't skip over the word? Hmm... I wonder whether the two {na}'s in {ko na ke'u na daspo le ckule} would cancel out? What would a robot bomber do? mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.