From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jan 03 07:23:58 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:23:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H27xp-0001Jt-B7 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:23:37 -0800 Received: from silene.metacarta.com ([65.77.47.18]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H27xj-0001Jk-BC for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:23:36 -0800 Received: from localhost (silene.metacarta.com [65.77.47.18]) by silene.metacarta.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F041E14C81F3 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:23:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from silene.metacarta.com ([65.77.47.18]) by localhost (silene.metacarta.com [65.77.47.18]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24534-05 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:23:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from [65.77.47.178] (cheyenne.metacarta.com [65.77.47.178]) by silene.metacarta.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D5614C81FB for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:23:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <459BCA64.50600@ropine.com> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 10:23:16 -0500 From: Seth Gordon User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20060926) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Military language References: <000c01c72ee9$d72544b0$6601a8c0@hq.squarei.net> <459BC0B2.3090803@ropine.com> <925d17560701030655ia74c764x43fa0448381c7a3f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <925d17560701030655ia74c764x43fa0448381c7a3f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at metacarta.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: -25 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13471 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: sethg@ropine.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Jorge Llambías wrote: >> Isn't there a standard to always use "NOT REPEAT NOT" in military >> telegrams to make sure the reader doesn't skip over the word? > > > Hmm... > > I wonder whether the two {na}'s in {ko na ke'u na daspo le ckule} > would cancel out? What would a robot bomber do? I had assumed that there was a more long-winded way of saying "na", but I don't see it from skimming the gismu list. Maybe one should tell the bomber {ko sisti lenu pu'o daspo le ckule}? > > mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.