From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jan 03 07:24:33 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:24:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H27yQ-0001Kg-HF for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:24:14 -0800 Received: from anno.name ([81.169.186.62] helo=mail.anno.name ident=postfix) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H27yM-0001KZ-IO for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:24:14 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.146] (p5085CB71.dip.t-dialin.net [80.133.203.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.anno.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A9C6AC10 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:24:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <459BCA7D.7070902@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:23:41 +0100 From: Timo Paulssen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061222) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Military language References: <000c01c72ee9$d72544b0$6601a8c0@hq.squarei.net> <459BC0B2.3090803@ropine.com> <925d17560701030655ia74c764x43fa0448381c7a3f@mail.gmail.com> <459BC8F6.7010009@perpetuum-immobile.de> In-Reply-To: <459BC8F6.7010009@perpetuum-immobile.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=21E90840 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6F8471538957C25A1EDA8C74" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: -25 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13472 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6F8471538957C25A1EDA8C74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Timo Paulssen wrote: > i think two {na} refering to the same work like one (ie the second one > overrides the first one) whoops, the CLL (chapter 15) says otherwise: The grammar of ``na'' allows multiple adjacent negations, which cancel out, as in normal logic: 2.11) ti na na barda prenu co melbi mi This [false] [false] is-a-big person that is (beautiful to me). which is the same as: 2.12) ti barda prenu co melbi mi This is a big-person that is (beautiful to me). --------------enig6F8471538957C25A1EDA8C74 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFm8p9us6NTCHpCEARAr4jAJwLDK3TZOZDV25UbSkww++Ow26+jACgjMgo BjzsOSqtgHbErHgybqlkQ4s= =utz3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6F8471538957C25A1EDA8C74-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.