From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Jan 03 07:42:14 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:42:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H28Ek-0001ql-Or for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:41:07 -0800 Received: from anno.name ([81.169.186.62] helo=mail.anno.name ident=postfix) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H28Ee-0001qU-8J for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 07:41:06 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.146] (p5085CB71.dip.t-dialin.net [80.133.203.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.anno.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E6F7B734 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 16:40:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <459BCE6B.8040603@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 16:40:27 +0100 From: Timo Paulssen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061222) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Military language References: <000c01c72ee9$d72544b0$6601a8c0@hq.squarei.net> <459BC0B2.3090803@ropine.com> In-Reply-To: <459BC0B2.3090803@ropine.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=21E90840 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE3B50F76AEA82909CBF421E3" X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Score-Int: -25 X-Spam-Bar: -- X-archive-position: 13474 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: timonator@perpetuum-immobile.de Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE3B50F76AEA82909CBF421E3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Seth Gordon wrote: > Isn't there a standard to always use "NOT REPEAT NOT" in military > telegrams to make sure the reader doesn't skip over the word? another thought that just came to my mind is that lojban allows the vowels to be spoken as long as the user desires to, so maybe i'd just say "naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa" instead of "na" :) --------------enigE3B50F76AEA82909CBF421E3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFm85uus6NTCHpCEARAmU/AJ9DtQuAs++DsNHzSArZsx7HaveIrACfSK5t OsqC13w8HsS0ds7QRpq9B/E= =BdlP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE3B50F76AEA82909CBF421E3-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.