From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Oct 10 10:24:55 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:24:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IffIk-0000G7-Ge for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:24:54 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IffIj-0000Fx-77 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:24:54 -0700 Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:24:53 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Archivist/Founders: Clarification of "fuzme", please. Message-ID: <20071010172453.GC13890@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-archive-position: 13870 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list Heard on IRC: I read {fuzme} as "x1 is tasked with/supposed to bring about x2 (according to authority x3)" (think baupla fuzykamni), not "x1 is the one who actually did x2" I think that's unlikely, because if it was "tasked with", bilga would be wholly redundant, but I'd like to hear the official word. Whichever it is, I'll be updating the jbovlaste definition accordingly. -Robin -- Lojban Reason #17: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffalo_buffalo Proud Supporter of the Singularity Institute - http://singinst.org/ http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.