From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Dec 18 11:49:57 2007 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:49:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J4iRw-0001EV-Dw for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:49:57 -0800 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1J4iRq-0001E3-Jy for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:49:56 -0800 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 4so1257983nfv.46 for ; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:49:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=61Ld23T7PMyF1SF5wwWaYrGgrxbip08amnNkd88sZFI=; b=bQ0NCYDHZioFhyLjQgHd+SKU5qD0RJL3Uv5B4L4XHzfCQmiTgG8i9CNw+HeRecwcNtHXbhZuFv1/qiMUqzefQkhv43VprZB2eJ38tWJrrWwutsuAO8RuUY2ztdeNZFN3t7vkp3Y9gJ9z7mXGa65hJnleFOIc5e+hIZ5w3FURk/Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mRc1rlD0QmqH/67pOQe7pA8BgsdETN2hHqC6FixcrQZ00Q+fqCFbBDNXPXqNdfyFO//cZJjGrwdW6nYcH+4xm7KoF++3C+X1QpbvL14KRnjRg8zcfn3wJiRfWn+JYIGsJD/Gp/Qht9HtPnvKkyHiLBjuAUt4DTb+JdnLsiZXCtA= Received: by 10.86.84.5 with SMTP id h5mr8061736fgb.27.1198007388854; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:49:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.86.13 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:49:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560712181149g31eaae19ia12527da055cb828@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:49:48 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: SVO order (was: Re: is a gismu a selbri?) In-Reply-To: <47682208.20803@perpetuum-immobile.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30712181039r134bca55v908d10e8be1323be@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560712181117k3d8ee116yab87e6e27d6d6361@mail.gmail.com> <3ccac5f10712181136w76664b5drdd962b2c9f12df97@mail.gmail.com> <47682208.20803@perpetuum-immobile.de> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14035 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Dec 18, 2007 4:39 PM, Timo Paulssen wrote: > Cyril Slobin wrote: > > I have just now discovered that English language has such a confusion. > > Correct me if I am wrong, but... In English we can speak, say, about > > the SVO order. "S" is for "Subject" here, and nobody mistakes "Subject" > > with "Noun", although noun can (and often do) work as subject. > > I have only been told of the SPO order: Subject, Predicate and Object. Then you've led a very sheltered life. :) The usual classification is SVO. The object is normally taken to be a part of the predicate, the predicate is the rest of the sentence besides the subject. I suppose we can get away with using "verb" for both senses because the verb of SVO usually can only consist of a verb in the part-of-speech sense. The subject and the object can be more varied, and in any case hey use the same part of speech, so they need to be distinguished. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.