From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jan 03 06:34:07 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:34:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JAR8z-0004AD-OI for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:34:02 -0800 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JAR8v-00049m-DG for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:34:01 -0800 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so3028725fga.0 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:33:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=RquLqZGdR9HhKjKDryx+FMjmcVAoDp9XcO/85EPLylc=; b=Z0Hu8/ZVNOathQP97N3P3JUm/rFhZv9L1b470P9QBCbB/59CuLlV4jKPzGXVtUejP8qYFPF6gOKV7bzDRJYr0aR5t2/EFtYXodKiRFjZ2SEFUlKVD6PvyAwi90nLfx6LsK9eDizNKy0vdg0G2huDFmgCp/w/gI5ZdQ4dqLXguXk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=U+Cb2fGV40PinqTW0F25DGataqBAwvHLT0wnxTGVNZQKWntUrgPgZrZIPMtAMw/5BlUFP4g0ezpAi5pj4309WIUbYCCqaf9YNwVDpvC/5v/gRjxCosCSas8lQt6zw6HLgoC7xSL+mP7Szh5RQN4XO7ce8wpL6BhJ4BWhp10Y0UA= Received: by 10.86.99.9 with SMTP id w9mr15679035fgb.44.1199370835300; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 06:33:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.1.11 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2008 06:33:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560801030633s1650f796j741ad63f1f96b4bf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:33:55 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Lojban-English full dictionary effort- request for assistance In-Reply-To: <477C38E2.80400@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <702226df0801021635h1e3f1cd1q8e9f848ae1e2a427@mail.gmail.com> <477C38E2.80400@lojban.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14069 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 1/2/08, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > If you coin a lujvo without > determining its place structure, you miss out on the possibility that > sel[xxxxxx] might be the best lujvo for an English concept. I suspect such lujvo will be very rare, because the tendency seems to be to interpret them as [selxxx]xxx. In jbovlaste I found only one each of types selkem[xxxxxx], terkem[xxxxxx], velkem[xxxxxx], and none with xelkem-. I couldn't find any without -kem- and meant to be interpreted as sel[xxxxxx], but there might be some and I might have missed them. Is anyone aware of any such lujvo? mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.