From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jan 03 17:13:01 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:13:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JAb7M-0002yq-Mz for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:13:01 -0800 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JAb7I-0002yj-80 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:13:00 -0800 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so3120645fga.0 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:12:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=hjr/hZ2ago7vhtvM/wHpu1AHHVuvLca+DwycNS1WyA0=; b=Dr/WQgsgXf2M0fqMDhbpsmdJ2FxIxwZeGJ7KDeYtMW+C2e81U/Zxcp+Y7+f/WrOjFPlRxUHIEetb1o/DBeaTMByjBxZuhDaXDnWwd1QLUl3SxL7X8Nf7p9nEUIkDwoVrnD8QqjhFZT1e3byhmWK1SmC4Vu4VWf1758CM+04DFJo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=srwZRIp5+lkRR16IbW540QhDDPuM4MYvNQFAHbHEXWrjNP43oiX1NuSQAh3Eu2FPWU+5M3TcsCTigOddw+STflUHnZt1F1nrk+JGyNdtAe8D4ESeoJUEcXjnBKrdm1SXeP7heNqwRPDFRAcWYgDGG1S0cyOYEP0NhV8aWx30X18= Received: by 10.86.28.5 with SMTP id b5mr7469322fgb.76.1199409174544; Thu, 03 Jan 2008 17:12:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.1.11 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:12:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560801031712mf8a1b3egb34c97def6e2a078@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 22:12:54 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Lojban-English full dictionary effort- request for assistance In-Reply-To: <477D7C63.2060005@lojban.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <702226df0801021635h1e3f1cd1q8e9f848ae1e2a427@mail.gmail.com> <477C38E2.80400@lojban.org> <925d17560801030633s1650f796j741ad63f1f96b4bf@mail.gmail.com> <477CFF5D.8000808@lojban.org> <925d17560801030747x698937aew7be717452b4c808a@mail.gmail.com> <477D4CB5.5060802@lojban.org> <925d17560801031412o5d1abb08q5626d980cdef5994@mail.gmail.com> <477D7C63.2060005@lojban.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14078 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Jan 3, 2008 9:22 PM, Bob LeChevalier wrote: > > Apparently you are discussing a different question than I am %^) Apparently yes. > > And among those tens, > > not one that I could find is meant as sel(xxxyyy), they are all > > (selxxx)yyy. > > One would think that the former would be expressed as selkemxxxyyy. Precisely. Hence my initial comment: << > If you coin a lujvo without >determining its place structure, you miss out on the possibility that >sel[xxxxxx] might be the best lujvo for an English concept. I suspect such lujvo will be very rare, because the tendency seems to be to interpret them as [selxxx]xxx. >> Hopefully my comment has become clear now. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.