From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Mar 07 05:40:20 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JXco7-0004u5-Gk for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:40:20 -0800 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.155]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JXco2-0004tX-5R for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:40:18 -0800 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so384343fga.0 for ; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:40:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=UYfIKK8VeBjFidr02IggLFXRioZu1yApBT67h+FLOhQ=; b=kXhOQMC/7UrjFT7KyCAPXWc1KjC73mnEME7QzLEdhBwEf1BkF+xp5LlaKUUJTQAHrjUfJLNggb8qsisfhKoEKQwI3lmdV1PK0rBfjLaVLvYDg2OD+SKaIjd19S69mcXupXuf9ruPsjNm0a1h9SKutiqDbGJtIBB6/mv4OF6qTpI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZLpwu4du7RhhBPJgszBXc2ykMIf/qi3Z6W3TJEij+so5xlfLvslvz+UjciNEvRy20AlA7VAkbwQ6Dhz39+qZnCdc+g8CKNrS1az5NrFkQQELEdie1rXcnpSNuan4YQWVZXCqwped/YaTqlM6oMX76pPQ/+Jdq5YwGtRAVF6fUzA= Received: by 10.86.73.17 with SMTP id v17mr1467864fga.67.1204897211781; Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:40:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.59.4 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 05:40:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560803070540u4de3bd8ere18f96c3b64c1c94@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 10:40:10 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: le ctucku mupli In-Reply-To: <431730.4709.qm@web62510.mail.re1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <431730.4709.qm@web62510.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14225 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 3/7/08, Liam Dalton wrote: > Here is the beginning of my outline, to see if it makes sense for the order > of the sections. Then there are some example pages, although in the actual > document the images would look far more professional. The order of the outline seems reasonable, although one could argue about details. For example, {la'e} and {tu'a} are the only two LAhEs that are frequently used, all the others are never or hardly ever used. Do they really need to be introduced at the same stage as {la'e} and {tu'a}? As for the sample, there is this claim about {la'e}: "It is used to talk about titles and other such labels." But that's backwards, it is used to talk about the labeled or titled thing, not about the labels and titles themselves. And in fact, its most frequent use is in {la'e di'u}, where {di'u} is not a label or a title but an expression, and {la'e di'u} is used to talk not about the expression but about what is expressed by the expression. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.