From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jun 17 05:41:39 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:41:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K8aVG-0007vm-Hu for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:41:39 -0700 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.157]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K8aV3-0007v6-Cg for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:41:38 -0700 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so3595810fga.0 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:41:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=oKwYvfq5Bl5Lx3rTgYfX3bZwnsNB2hi6VJKBubqeFgw=; b=X8LY+3O3sHf4Zh2CZ0khYgLdfjQmxBn9Hsu69nkVlPnaS4za2e3HBx3nxcxl+hBDQG L2zIrt/kOfMVrOaWMDd6DyDNAXi6fsgQOM7QZuzVYscvQleDfqIe3E4Gb5qfagJUu4Vo 5smUlOuc9pqH+8o7giBfAWDuFk3KCm9rG0w3Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=PaENlOzIdvD4rVVGddPpuSdi6kkvgqJY7/aKe4Awb6xiD/KF+/Yn2tqI+ZcRD2h4xj ABC1LQ42fi8QVSIZzKbbD9cHmsM2ZI904DPB0mKLye86Glrpn76oiskfOzaVCsfk2JTT Yo08zo24c6mOhqnFHhXKdd2WrxnJn2p+yCeAg= Received: by 10.86.25.17 with SMTP id 17mr9039612fgy.50.1213706483772; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.89.11 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560806170541m20e68b1ela79b0259e260b7de@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 09:41:23 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: PEG grammar issues In-Reply-To: <737b61f30806161610q69ae0539kf5627d78dac3d6b8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30806151939g53bbd8a1s3480b51573d433a1@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560806160934x6ebb01fayca3ddaddfca5c401@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30806161610q69ae0539kf5627d78dac3d6b8@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14507 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 6/16/08, Chris Capel wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Jorge Llambías wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:39 PM, Chris Capel wrote: > >> Second, selbri-3 should parse its child selbri-4 into left-associative > >> groups. > > The same applies to statement-1, bridi-tail-1 and sumti-2, right? > > No to 'statement-1' because I don't think > statement-2's really have associativity, so the correct parse tree > would be flat, and the current parse tree is flat, so it's not broken. ijeks are left associative: (broda ije brode) ija brodi not: broda ije (brode ija brodi) To get the latter you need {ijabo} > Same thing for bridi-tail-1 and sumti-2--do those really have > associativity? Does it matter which order you interpret the giheks or > jeks? In general, yes. In particular cases, for example if you have only {je}s, or only {ja}s, it doesn't matter. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.