From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jun 17 11:55:29 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:55:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K8gL3-0004fu-IX for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:55:29 -0700 Received: from yw-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.46.154]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K8gKz-0004fc-6U for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:55:29 -0700 Received: by yw-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 5so3099571ywm.46 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:55:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=AXLGN0itmwXHlIY/mZxRdHMFOwLBCDZ2/s/YJyPw46o=; b=AH+kwPQg7RxLMtfMRnVHOM89BSyfXwmnZTxUQjqBh2p6kGikbTl3Id/6aKPtgaxub5 Pf9i/hnHUpxSYJQMgWJ0AutcVgNVwf+kufpQcoaRtAguDV+Bxovbh+tzG+rIbUTemh91 FisypL8EsS4LsiGjLhe2pVVHVtJB7LO3PQMdE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=VFgu4O1xaVs2lID87jVka1jFhUjGGSNSEkEyUHjpxp2Sk8lY+a9n/3EInz4x3c0DtB k+JOrGO9vAOK8tpqc7b2j8QMoVAyvDFPGkUiOxF7i1wqYQakSni14c/BWARb6khyIQ6K 8q2WC90olbr9UV3f1h+7tFQzOTAHolsRyvUc4= Received: by 10.142.44.11 with SMTP id r11mr3260740wfr.178.1213728919665; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.50.21 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 11:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <737b61f30806171155n37f7c554m7fee596069e117ed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 13:55:19 -0500 From: "Chris Capel" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: PEG grammar issues In-Reply-To: <925d17560806170541m20e68b1ela79b0259e260b7de@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30806151939g53bbd8a1s3480b51573d433a1@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560806160934x6ebb01fayca3ddaddfca5c401@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30806161610q69ae0539kf5627d78dac3d6b8@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560806170541m20e68b1ela79b0259e260b7de@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14509 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pdf23ds@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Jorge Llambías wrote: > ijeks are left associative: > > (broda ije brode) ija brodi > > not: > > broda ije (brode ija brodi) > > To get the latter you need {ijabo} Are ijabos right associative with each other? broda ijabo (brode ijabo brodi)? Oh, here's another one: the NU-clause option of tanru-unit-2. Does that need associativity? Or what about terms-1 or selbri-4 (or tag)? Oh, here's another weirdness thing (indented for clarity): statement-2 <- statement-3 (I-clause (jek / joik)? stag? BO-clause free* statement-2)? / statement-3 (I-clause (jek / joik)? stag? BO-clause free*)? Isn't that identical to statement-2 <- statement-3 (I-clause (jek / joik)? stag? BO-clause free* statement-2?)? It'd be nice to simplify. Chris Capel -- "What is it like to be a bat? What is it like to bat a bee? What is it like to be a bee being batted? What is it like to be a batted bee?" -- The Mind's I (Hofstadter, Dennet) To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.