From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Jun 17 12:15:01 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:15:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K8gdw-0006Cr-Ll for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:15:01 -0700 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K8gdo-0006CD-16 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:15:00 -0700 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so3696996fga.0 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:14:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=1kS5NbtiaUFIBCMyMYWBVJ9S1avtiTDGEcZ3LM4h7Mg=; b=Y74IaxFQp1YM8PS71ALvMv9ZsiTZZd7mNZ3/fxL0EtyQ58m5hc5ZpejlrF+d8ddzN+ /akf0M7Qw2HPKOUe9dAO3Ay3tEpT/f//+fmlsDnXuDeudfh/w+fDLBWKj2Ha3qwD4Msw H233OXXwF+wumm9/x26iy+8TefXZSuK+BmeeM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=DdVQK7Qgtz718Klc22Ph5HmpS+We0KrORD+SgUraZIqBY2kef4t760FlAZ2mmtO/6+ faX5VndptXQ6Dm9TsBmGpPoJGW+bxoqxo7OGgtuQlFENMHg3H6Z72R+vjEbB0tUslwhB AMuQtptpAcR77Frx1qNNdIqNSnRSuk7JCLwVo= Received: by 10.86.59.18 with SMTP id h18mr9372986fga.67.1213730090041; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.89.11 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:14:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <925d17560806171214h4348bfbesaa47931a3a943f4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:14:50 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: PEG grammar issues In-Reply-To: <737b61f30806171155n37f7c554m7fee596069e117ed@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30806151939g53bbd8a1s3480b51573d433a1@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560806160934x6ebb01fayca3ddaddfca5c401@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30806161610q69ae0539kf5627d78dac3d6b8@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560806170541m20e68b1ela79b0259e260b7de@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30806171155n37f7c554m7fee596069e117ed@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14510 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On 6/17/08, Chris Capel wrote: > Are ijabos right associative with each other? > > broda ijabo (brode ijabo brodi)? Yes. (With two {ija} it makes no difference though, you need to mix {ija} with {ije} for example to get different meanings.) > Oh, here's another one: the NU-clause option of tanru-unit-2. Does > that need associativity? Probably, but since it's a construction that nobody ever uses (and hopefully nobody ever will) it doesn't matter. > Or what about terms-1 or selbri-4 (or tag)? Yes, they are all left-asssoc. > Oh, here's another weirdness thing (indented for clarity): > > statement-2 <- > statement-3 (I-clause (jek / joik)? stag? BO-clause free* statement-2)? / > statement-3 (I-clause (jek / joik)? stag? BO-clause free*)? > > Isn't that identical to > > statement-2 <- statement-3 (I-clause (jek / joik)? stag? BO-clause > free* statement-2?)? > > It'd be nice to simplify. Yes. I think there are some other slightly weird points. If I remember correctly, one rule has an unreachable part. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.