From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Jun 20 10:58:05 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:58:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K9ks9-0005uo-PA for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:58:05 -0700 Received: from mx.freeshell.org ([192.94.73.19] helo=sdf.lonestar.org ident=root) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1K9ks4-0005uK-2x for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:58:05 -0700 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:jwodder@faeroes.freeshell.org [192.94.73.9]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m5KHvt8S009136 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:57:55 GMT Received: (from jwodder@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.2/8.12.8/Submit) id m5KHvtJ6023024 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:57:55 GMT Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:57:55 +0000 From: Minimiscience To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: termsets and "equal scope" Message-ID: <20080620175754.GB26775@sdf.lonestar.org> References: <925d17560806200950y1a745756v24b874abf03f38f4@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <925d17560806200950y1a745756v24b874abf03f38f4@mail.gmail.com> Organization: SDF Public Access UNIX System X-Mutt-References: <925d17560806200950y1a745756v24b874abf03f38f4@mail.gmail. com> X-Mutt-Fcc: =[Gmail]/Sent Mail User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by sdf.lonestar.org id m5KHvt8S009136 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14531 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: minimiscience@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list dei li 20 pi'e 06 pi'e 2008 la'o fy. Jorge Llambías .fy. cusku zoi skamyxatra. > But where does that leave the notion that numerical quantifiers in Lojban are > "exact" (meaning that if {ci broda cu brode} is true then {re broda cu brode} > is not true)? .skamyxatra Where is it stated in the CLL that numbers are to be interpreted as "exact"? That seems like it would limit speech quite a bit, and I personally find it to be counter-intuitive and somewhat illogical. mu'omi'e la'o gy. Minimiscience .gy. -- mi pu klama .i mi pu viska .i mi pu fanva fi la lojban. To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.