From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Jul 10 07:44:58 2008
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:44:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1KGxOE-0002dh-AN	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:44:58 -0700
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <jjllambias@gmail.com>)	id 1KGxOA-0002dI-MF	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:44:58 -0700
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so1373812fga.0        for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to         :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type         :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;        bh=Ro7UQgfVHTvnHBf5jP3dAJZxL82cNU+eHCFk5fQKV30=;        b=x3PAhTtLCnzmKa7lTTk20iDxVMDibVwR6L5gyax91v65PhQaGMjkySxFGFBDZzM3dp         kl1ZAjBUx+XZdDVLeCd3VM7zuSMFb3rSw5V1qutpBMfuj8M7WioOyb6YnsMrIk1X4BHY         SOR/JowqG1+uAJsiNb09u56HynMo8XafkOShM=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition         :references;        b=AqV/e/h4c80JaLaIS535wA0XIAN4/khVsx3sWGEgDa3fyMOTUhitV2u+ALfuNWePT6         c+pbTlRqa3Q2AdGrxvozTE6LJAsBRllShXefvBntvzWaMdDYdLnmCc5EVxumHVzeo1Bn         YV/HgdLXUEsgYA+3gCUzOXFKXEENVbyKceg7k=
Received: by 10.86.92.7 with SMTP id p7mr8807329fgb.72.1215701091487;        Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.86.28.10 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <925d17560807100744g3959112fn4481cee930b2ac29@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:44:51 -0300
From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: Attitudionals in a "la" clause
In-Reply-To: <3ccac5f10807100610o20540cte45148370b69e4a0@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <3ccac5f10807100610o20540cte45148370b69e4a0@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0
X-Spam-Score-Int: 0
X-Spam-Bar: /
X-archive-position: 14594
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On 7/10/08, Cyril Slobin <cyril@slobin.pp.ru> wrote:
> coi rodo
>
> If the selbri after "la" contains an attitudional, is it concerned as
> a part of a name, or as an attitude of a speaker? Example:
>
> {la oi cortu cu klama}
>
> Is it a claim about the person named "oi cortu" or a claim about the
> person named "cortu", and expression of a pain that speaker feels
> while saying this?

That {oi} is not contained by the selbri, it attaches to the gadri, so there
can't be any doubt in that case that it is not part of the name. If you had
{la cortu oi} there might be some question, but I think it's also an
attachment to the name and not a part of it. If you wanted it as part of
the name you need to do something like {la oi zei cortu}.

mu'o mi'e xorxes


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.