From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Oct 03 04:14:47 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:14:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KlicQ-00013U-J7 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:14:47 -0700 Received: from narnia.blumen-schwarz.de ([80.190.195.21]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KlicN-00011k-3G for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2008 04:14:46 -0700 Received: from wh28.stw.stud.uni-saarland.de ([134.96.48.59] helo=nicte.localnet) by narnia.blumen-schwarz.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1KlicD-0005S0-La for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 03 Oct 2008 13:14:36 +0200 From: Roman Naumann To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: New, more Lojbanic Lojban orthography Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 13:14:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.1 (Linux/2.6.26-1-amd64; KDE/4.1.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <200810030219.56213.eldrikdo@gmail.com> <8f234f340810030400m4e10b925nba91d9e75519839b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8f234f340810030400m4e10b925nba91d9e75519839b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary-00=_75f5I0XOm17+IyQ" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200810031314.03479.eldrikdo@gmail.com> X-Spam_score: -5.3 X-Spam_score_int: -52 X-Spam_bar: ----- X-Spam_report: ------------- Start der SpamAssassin Auswertung --------------- Bei Fragen dazu bitte das Forum life.d.cvmx verwenden! Details der Inhaltsanalyse: (-5.3 Punkte, 5.0 benoetigt) -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Nachricht wurde nur über vertrauenswürdige Rechner weitergeleitet -4.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Spamwahrscheinlichkeit nach Bayes-Test: 0-1% [score: 0.0000] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: Nachricht enthält HTML 0.5 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list ---------------- Ende der SpamAssassin Auswertung ----------------- X-Spam-Score: 1.2 X-Spam-Score-Int: 12 X-Spam-Bar: + X-archive-position: 14822 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: eldrikdo@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --Boundary-00=_75f5I0XOm17+IyQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Friday 03 October 2008 13:00:33 Auke Booij wrote: > but then again, the actual machinecode doesn't contain readable ()[]{} > either (except for the "coincidental" cases). everything is a command out > there. True, but we were discussing about beauty (and readability). Machine code is neither; so machine code was certainly not meant to be included in "most programming lang(uage)s" when I said "it (lojban) looks even worse than most programming langs". -- mu'o mi'e nam --Boundary-00=_75f5I0XOm17+IyQ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Friday 03 October 2008 13:00:33 Auke Booij wrote:

> but then again, the actual machinecode doesn't contain readable ()[]{}

> either (except for the "coincidental" cases). everything is a command out

> there.

True, but we were discussing about beauty (and readability).

Machine code is neither; so machine code was certainly

not meant to be included in "most programming lang(uage)s"

when I said "it (lojban) looks even worse than most programming langs".

--

mu'o mi'e nam

--Boundary-00=_75f5I0XOm17+IyQ-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.