From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Nov 03 12:35:00 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:35:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kx68Z-0003B8-T5 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:35:00 -0800 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.247]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kx68X-0003At-D7 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:34:59 -0800 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so2782862rvf.46 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:34:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=W8nZIz++XrQEGRb9rA4/uNZlrYwgWuLXthdvJK5WjS0=; b=EvWZuktC/4mbkoPhZjbg+1zzkFAsW8VAOHkjEoebBvwZ5p+RqebD3eqmHlRmHOU1Ed iVbVWB7Zt4yWBEhfNqW7SfbAclwQZLEJx/qPSEDZ+PneSUkNWTeWo3S+R8FDnzPCedjY jYzjNpdHg9gj0BpRBwUU8WMVYBfueN2dFueAQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=uBVCUUdyN/eutnbaA6d4WqqPei7j8I8NotF5na+s4yEVsj7kdaH3piCl0HofA7aEDW EptrS6eLFNuUrKdGbLmEtair5+RDx1bt+kaH1ovL8Z6MKRooJaA0qvc7ZaaMsJ7apOkT 371sGGj1yQ/gbQFs1VCFaeWYgKXXYTE+I0lbM= Received: by 10.141.179.5 with SMTP id g5mr336069rvp.30.1225744495973; Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:34:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.194.15 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:34:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560811031234x2bf89df1i11eecb308041ec37@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 17:34:55 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: experimental cmavo in lojgloss. In-Reply-To: <20081103195311.GK2447@nvg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30811022128n9e8692evefaa820062d2a652@mail.gmail.com> <20081103195311.GK2447@nvg.org> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14917 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: > > Camxes (the candidate for the next official parser) does not recognize experimental cmavo at all. Well, it does recognize them as experimental cmavo, it just doesn't assign them to any particular selma'o, so they can't be used to do much. It has no problem parsing {zo la'oi cu cipra cmavo}, for example. Or recognizing {la'oi bu} as a lerfu, or {la'oi zei da} as a tanru unit. Modifying the grammar to treat all unassigned cmavo as UI would be easy if that was desirable. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.