From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Tue Nov 04 03:50:34 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Tue, 04 Nov 2008 03:50:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KxKQb-0004fI-N2 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 03:50:34 -0800 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.244]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KxKQW-0004e6-G7 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 03:50:33 -0800 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so3171738rvf.46 for ; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 03:50:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=f8xnIqp1meAw9dlyOPWXyrJcYbzV50Weyb6dCftiTKQ=; b=ICYYbv3sj/WbP2j2bjv1veIw0cU2iDePHm83YF99ZYqwtqNhTzdTi3qIogGU6AeVBG POZjEeCkcxhNX2V1ovkh3eyvdXbTaIN9siNin4PbIPgX1paOaJIR29l9MNH3QopLTiha 5s2aENr2bPzRb6kFOLm5sr+gfZK/KRQOgfq1c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=tykohu82DKwZaI4Vh5Sc0Alhv8CRyo7MfidsgdFY5/Adxx+rRcm/XyZHdzTgfgd/Zz Oxe8lU7c4sPgKZtBvibhAlCILWLl28TDigey2QMKdc1yEr5UCI4LS1SsuuWIXbDrTk8z nE5vNmL5tv9zZxgw8C2YJ+Yc8pmVV5beHLGko= Received: by 10.141.153.16 with SMTP id f16mr810238rvo.17.1225799426881; Tue, 04 Nov 2008 03:50:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.194.15 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Nov 2008 03:50:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560811040350g2a04db8ewd2f34a8a43d96767@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 08:50:26 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: experimental cmavo in lojgloss. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30811022128n9e8692evefaa820062d2a652@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811031040t402eb7a9k31e0d61bf7ca3cea@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14920 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:35 AM, Daniel Brockman wrote: > >> > http://www.lojban.org/tiki/tiki-index.php?page=le'ai > > It doesn't have to actually make the replacements at the parser level. Just > having a grammar for it so that it can parse would be totally fine. It can > be treated as an informal indicator that has to be interpreted at a higher > level. An internal grammar for the construction, and then making the construction a free indicator, is doable. But in that case it won't be of help for fixing something that is grammatically broken, like SI/SA/SU are meant to do. For example {mi kjama le zarji lo'ai kjama sa'ai klama le'ai} will parse as "{mi} followed by uninterpretable gibberish", so it will never get to a higher level for interpretation. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.