From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Nov 06 15:29:08 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:29:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KyEHk-0000iZ-Qm for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:29:08 -0800 Received: from yx-out-1718.google.com ([74.125.44.158]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KyEHh-0000iR-Nc for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:29:08 -0800 Received: by yx-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 4so395133yxp.46 for ; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:29:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=VxRQeEFeYZzKfDKB3qkQvUy7UIggfs5zbYCe7JbH6qY=; b=nCA3bwqYtsGOioA41WDhmuO75KzJHqMbkvbURXCR+EwWdSOKUslSdjp7E28k2gAFig RgUwr7770NuTsU+N5cckYdLkYbKNu2wApE2Yk50WgEMeEBagX9LTMvb24dHzWNkCV/lH OwFuz6uxh9Sew3Qo5+TacuQUyBNpxegDKHxI4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=gXrGxyP+NR13e02N8srHAi2FHwDSniB8fO7AgVu+v9DVQm+JyNg6KQvjUohWp7p4vh 8yvab014ALEnVaWbnz2a6bcrcJLhimfiTQDlf+tvoWmzFMKq2F6q3MXoXN3yT2JPY2qO NExMRtFKUIX402UYWkmOh4z8DKg6ToMiXfhPk= Received: by 10.150.50.1 with SMTP id x1mr2283535ybx.132.1226014144177; Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:29:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.199.20 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 15:29:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <737b61f30811061529t55da3860p4bb4157d02365ff2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 17:29:04 -0600 From: "Chris Capel" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: experimental cmavo in lojgloss. In-Reply-To: <925d17560811060547x91443b1p7756e152f8093036@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30811022128n9e8692evefaa820062d2a652@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811040350g2a04db8ewd2f34a8a43d96767@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811041523o3574936fp27dea91b6a058c26@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811050534i514b3fddv197b2a07a47655f9@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811051630t6adad5e0x54456e789d70c5b@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811060547x91443b1p7756e152f8093036@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14940 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pdf23ds@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 07:47, Jorge Llambías wrote: > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Chris Capel wrote: >> Now, SA has a lot more complicated grammar, so lo'ai would >> be easier to implement even using the same technique. (And contrary to >> Jorge, I'm not too sure it would introduce any weird interactions with >> the SA machinery.) > > I don't think interactions with SA are the problem. I think LOhAI (if > the construction is to be more than just a free modifier) is much more > complicated than SA, with or without interactions. I agree their > interaction is mostly irrelevant. Sorry, I wasn't talking about full lo'ai there, just the restricted subset that would treat it like a quote. Chris Capel -- "What is it like to be a bat? What is it like to bat a bee? What is it like to be a bee being batted? What is it like to be a batted bee?" -- The Mind's I (Hofstadter, Dennet) To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.