From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Nov 07 01:45:14 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:45:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KyNty-0004OD-AM for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:45:14 -0800 Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.186]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KyNtt-0004Nz-Th for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:45:14 -0800 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so1381723fks.2 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:45:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=0JkiPbPVSNodZTQVqSACDYWxopygbrLbnFTp5FQhoZQ=; b=cmxr37Xf5jwHQZaB6XYtqFI1Kbm00hFiAfJvF27fwWzceOmiPUu6dJQcThI5bIeuWO lqztOoShPR47ULUr3NZv4dEXiXeSdlEq+G18skvB1BAiH5vRXOoHw1R5FJhKwIOD3KSZ wr6B+A2jv6v5fIVAggZJm2tfZdkaDiy1aV/Fo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=v/tq+JDSDbhw3EYqglXakL4Qon6lfJ1HRcE+s96gyLM1CrgQsCI8+mIsdiBJIz4ATP YLDTvQi09R6YCo41hHezpGxtpbJ7dN1foXqa4tClKcaopPbfaeNXbQ3JtSgszd/upQcH 5BDHOikw/9dqnc0PjU8nulmz2+P189pTDJnSM= Received: by 10.181.152.14 with SMTP id e14mr976188bko.189.1226051108301; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 01:45:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.1.5 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 01:45:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 10:45:08 +0100 From: "Daniel Brockman" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: experimental cmavo in lojgloss. In-Reply-To: <737b61f30811061529t55da3860p4bb4157d02365ff2@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30811022128n9e8692evefaa820062d2a652@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811040350g2a04db8ewd2f34a8a43d96767@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811041523o3574936fp27dea91b6a058c26@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811050534i514b3fddv197b2a07a47655f9@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811051630t6adad5e0x54456e789d70c5b@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811060547x91443b1p7756e152f8093036@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811061529t55da3860p4bb4157d02365ff2@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 53faf0f4f14a1a05 X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14941 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: daniel@brockman.se Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list > Sorry, I wasn't talking about full lo'ai there, just the restricted > subset that would treat it like a quote. Now that we're deep into this discussion, I might as well ask, how would {lo'ai .. sa'ai .. le'ai} interact with other magic words? (I'm assuming the grammar would be consistent with already existing similar constructions.) Like, I assume {lo'ai zo sa'ai sa'ai le'ai} would be okay. What about {lo'ai lo'u sa'ai le'u sa'ai le'ai}? Is there a simple rule to follow? (I'm still, as I have been from the start, talking about parsing the construction as just a free modifier parenthetical quote-like thing.) -- Daniel Brockman daniel@brockman.se To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.