From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Nov 07 03:36:09 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:36:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KyPdJ-0006Xy-2M for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:36:09 -0800 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.244]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KyPdG-0006XP-AA for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:36:09 -0800 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so1081362rvf.46 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:36:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=O33G2ogHHsKFGCKFGM9IvhUOA272WQib8IQrTde8mR8=; b=OvrZ9GNvLoWbhPNMyBMnackrXctXhF7bHZGGcA5MOCWUvAUucBUku8mbryAc9WvPpA seKM2oLvBi4BqnMA0NzhMCTOsjYfa6gNR2+kq5Z/Pd9uNaU72/zKz9Q3xBjL0aaLvxQg fSxu4T4kzVNxYMjkrD4u/RMYv85ygai3MrHDA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=st13mXrxkuWE0utCAXc0S5uPVT3ns6zHtnmihqNiprPWtLCrQobMxpm5knlpjesOmU SSKhlr0ZCUhO/kAM5acz7dc7qujtKrLVoCMJw5gPQyd+KSzX61Eq9LpaNCR6Bty1evjk rfECjI2NIcusfToNRLFwYJI2DyhEUzN+Gt6N8= Received: by 10.140.207.2 with SMTP id e2mr1713342rvg.251.1226057765373; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 03:36:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.194.15 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 03:36:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560811070336lbaaebd2h30f9073f5464f215@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 08:36:05 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: experimental cmavo in lojgloss. In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30811022128n9e8692evefaa820062d2a652@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811041523o3574936fp27dea91b6a058c26@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811050534i514b3fddv197b2a07a47655f9@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811051630t6adad5e0x54456e789d70c5b@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811060547x91443b1p7756e152f8093036@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811061529t55da3860p4bb4157d02365ff2@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14943 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:45 AM, Daniel Brockman wrote: > > Now that we're deep into this discussion, I might as well ask, > how would {lo'ai .. sa'ai .. le'ai} interact with other magic words? > (I'm assuming the grammar would be consistent with already > existing similar constructions.) If it's modelled on lo'e ... le'u, it should simply treat them as all empty words, i.e. ignore their meaning. > Like, I assume {lo'ai zo sa'ai sa'ai le'ai} would be okay. That would replace a "zo" with a "sa'ai" ("zo" and the second "sa'ai" are just empty words, not parsed with their function). > What about {lo'ai lo'u sa'ai le'u sa'ai le'ai}? Replaces "lo'u" with "le'u sa'ai". > Is there a simple rule to follow? First come, first served. The first magic word is the one with the magic. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.