From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Nov 07 06:09:05 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:09:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KyS1J-0007n4-2r for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:09:05 -0800 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.159]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KyS1F-0007m2-Hu for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:09:05 -0800 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so1190319fga.0 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:09:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=mH7vS8MOKAciGxVbH+1tvDr6NDPR9ZuoqujSqqIVUoU=; b=wMCzbtUy1ZO/DWFtzwUcrhoX9fbtWiheBAetC3x38Ga0JRQNKXkZuA5aGYqOOfmv/s K1mJgIEYtfVq2YZILIENxO83R1eswDlpmvv0trRGnLKL5iexzuRlvXS4AKoCuLfEjlRP BCR8YZKY4plB7FGRlwqarQfhYFufI3SAJZ9Xs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=j5ngWCR9Ef3PkOCN3cFMtY/OlF21f44DD1Izeqe6q+GxMd5VV4SqTB/K/fleExQ/lv m/dBsSKQr9XRolQEiensdJPfuEYq+bPLuy+P+Dz8mbfcXCbvRt78K0rUnrqGYxpT7bqn jy+1gsqGW+IaEwvUNwHlQObE6AoatsgH0D4YI= Received: by 10.181.61.7 with SMTP id o7mr1060189bkk.85.1226066939839; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:08:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.1.5 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 06:08:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:08:59 +0100 From: "Daniel Brockman" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.) In-Reply-To: <925d17560811070554m1b3a060ds5904bb7451ce7920@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30811070541l45110d3dsc5144714e926e32d@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811070554m1b3a060ds5904bb7451ce7920@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0444d285b5f7597f X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14950 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: daniel@brockman.se Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list > "tei" and "tau" are what I would have > liked for "la'e di'u" and "la'e de'u", or something like that. Interesting. Those are some wasted quality short cmavo. I keep thinking we should deprecate all those short cmavo that nobody uses as soon as possible, so we can start using them for something else eventually. > But I > wouldn't mind not having "di'u" (and all its cousins) there in the > first place. Agreed. Those are the only members of KOhA I neither remember nor use, except for {di'u} and {di'e}. > "lu'e tei", "lu'e tau" would have been the compounds to > be used in the more rare cases when we do want to refer to the > expressions themselves. Very wise, Zipf-wise. -- Daniel Brockman daniel@brockman.se To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.