From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Nov 07 06:57:40 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:57:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KySmJ-0004qg-Hm for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:57:40 -0800 Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1KySmG-0004qZ-9q for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:57:39 -0800 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e12so1209187fga.0 for ; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:57:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=VyM9CejQZZIdl2QNAaUTBNVAhaKBrjCc+6QMkigaaVU=; b=HEH1FdYjoYLX9veCDKamTlvVFa0ELld4dawb5DMDnNoY+XO6D0yDVDFde+lh1Ko6Rc 5Nk9eFKeNVvdWYc++4ezUZItRCajeGboq7RKocQ13NH9d8hNr52ux6KlR/LWTvolXSHV kCeMY/0bmThvPgZM3fLfg3m3Oa3rf81RCU4cI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=QaJsd+F3VqdxlvwQUdxmDwnyVixXmzr9yBc+8r8JDWaJ9Y8Ill/0G3TP96w03LZFeU oZzTD+HhFiR5NWfgC8Jw7zyNSIfR/odX2PxQXCYlgILvShpIX/203ors4VnYz0PZqf/G 2JDX8ovdB/+XzvHF0Jw4ZxCqstepAbdkMDLKg= Received: by 10.181.144.11 with SMTP id w11mr1074888bkn.27.1226069854902; Fri, 07 Nov 2008 06:57:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.181.1.5 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Nov 2008 06:57:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 15:57:34 +0100 From: "Daniel Brockman" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.) In-Reply-To: <20081107142028.GC2447@nvg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30811070541l45110d3dsc5144714e926e32d@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811070554m1b3a060ds5904bb7451ce7920@mail.gmail.com> <20081107142028.GC2447@nvg.org> X-Google-Sender-Auth: da03a94bac9189ba X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14953 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: daniel@brockman.se Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list > Anyway, reassignment of extant cmavo is not likely to happen, for reasons of forwards-compatibility. If nobody uses a cmavo and we deprecate it, is it still "extant"? -- Daniel Brockman daniel@brockman.se To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.