From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Nov 08 08:55:13 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:55:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kyr5d-0000UX-2K for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:55:13 -0800 Received: from mail-gx0-f15.google.com ([209.85.217.15]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Kyr5a-0000Tl-K8 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:55:12 -0800 Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so1319098gxk.10 for ; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:55:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=evWMLqx3mWmqLiZR14IX6BjQiwDZCK5Cv71CVgbel6M=; b=PiK9baOX+t4QUdpi6Wq5hMVPrEk40+7fq/00lh0ecgGHGSdoFw1QQ7pknL+I6XfzuX jPvrDzpcsmBFd7Uu8c47NRkV3eKWpYdyh2CdlLLaKcaJe19CxSTAU8J9lgS/M7ik3X1+ qfSfKUMavnSaB2sHjq6CW3luDfgc9Bs7FRUqE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=mquueCkc//vh75+oF81enaoFz+gUGyj3q7gUirGGxahY099EFY0fe6rIMbJEjOjaQ2 SXgu/Hk8yO0TZIhLH5CmyAs4jUuKvMp1O9DO42wO8BH49DM3vHWtRwKsTJUsXfDRFPjP EkVppCi6LAQbDvXSPAEL70wmTASSYDrzxXrZU= Received: by 10.150.156.9 with SMTP id d9mr5946177ybe.120.1226163304217; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 08:55:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.199.20 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 08:55:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <737b61f30811080855m5963538bmf3960a89446feb01@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 10:55:04 -0600 From: "Chris Capel" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: la'e di'u (was: experimental cmavo in lojgloss.) In-Reply-To: <737b61f30811080854wc6c88e0qbfdd95f8b1ac6044@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30811070541l45110d3dsc5144714e926e32d@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811070554m1b3a060ds5904bb7451ce7920@mail.gmail.com> <20081107142028.GC2447@nvg.org> <737b61f30811080854wc6c88e0qbfdd95f8b1ac6044@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 14960 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: pdf23ds@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 10:54, Chris Capel wrote: > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 08:57, Daniel Brockman wrote: >>> Anyway, reassignment of extant cmavo is not likely to happen, for reasons of forwards-compatibility. >> >> If nobody uses a cmavo and we deprecate it, is it still "extant"? > > The key here, I think, is not whether we're using it now, but whether > it has even ever > been used. To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.