From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Nov 12 09:29:07 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:29:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L0JWc-0006i7-Ei for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:29:07 -0800 Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.134.186]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L0JWT-0006hW-Sd for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:29:06 -0800 Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so489407mue.6 for ; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:28:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references :x-google-sender-auth; bh=cPYEWkfp0/ThbJWfH7DkiZFymkVQGGPZcYRFopXSCJA=; b=gGShd5ocgZevknhS5cOhwxcPAHfjTUtupcnXsKGQEQ+NPGNkpklKhjftZkEEuWcdkn rdI/nNh85e9E1wj4o6Z8ggDiNhyGcfdW2ArB7R8xnHW61q6ktj2SuAu9dO0IZ+CV75Gc 1O67ADlhZvcZjMQnhZRBCUI/tNmeS1vYWCdA0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=IGlTvM//TgxPdO0BIc16f1JkPPPFC+CynIX3xlPNLhinCAdQ2i5G+UF0lHhw87qSf+ lGdiGAN3uK1SPoZxVmVgQ2wlXQgsrwOT8A9gCmWUVYlLtfJXd5T/A9Cw5bUHPweo36Gi 3UROWR6t6sMbCu7PfjIW8EV1wb20/G+GOSXlY= Received: by 10.187.166.12 with SMTP id t12mr3227999fao.1.1226510936196; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:28:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.187.190.8 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 09:28:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <12d58c160811120928s284117fbi2f9ac159f993266e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:28:56 -0500 From: "komfo,amonan" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Lojban Sentence Templates In-Reply-To: <96f789a60811120639m5d4332c8i37303d9f1948cb44@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10636_29758850.1226510936202" References: <12d58c160811101050y574e255cid15b1579ac2a9079@mail.gmail.com> <200811101628.01128.phma@phma.optus.nu> <12d58c160811101434o75eb747eie6298e2282499369@mail.gmail.com> <96f789a60811120639m5d4332c8i37303d9f1948cb44@mail.gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: d4525f89a348f6a3 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 15014 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: komfoamonan@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list ------=_Part_10636_29758850.1226510936202 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 5:34 PM, komfo,amonan > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Pierre Abbat > wrote: > >> > >> On Monday 10 November 2008 13:50:47 komfo,amonan wrote: > >> > Smallish point: Is there any reason not to merge < gismu >, < lujvo >, > >> > and > >> > < fu'ivla > into < brivla >? The distinctions between those three seem > >> > not > >> > relevant to the stated purpose. { le do .arxokuna cu barkla di'u } > works > >> > just as well, right? > >> > >> arxokuna ki'a? .i lumge'u java'i prokiono xu? > > > > go'i .i mi ca lo nu djica lo nu fanva cu pu facki fi no valsi be fi la > > lojban .i zvati pe'a la jbovlaste ji lo drata > > doi komfo,amonan .iki'u lo nu do finti zo arxokuna fi'o velji'i tu'a > la'o net. http://laxmahispajispaji.blogspot.com/2007_02_01_archive.html > net. kei do djuno lo du'u makau fo makau cu te fu'ivla .i ma joi ma du > la'edi'u zo arxokuna fu'ivla fo zoi zoi aroughcun/arethkone/arehkan zoi noi ke'a valsi fi la'o zoi Powhatan zoi zi'e noi ke'a krasi zoi zoi raccoon zoi .i ra morsi pe'a bangu .i je la'a mi fu'irgau ei fi lo valsi be fi lo jmive pe'a bangu be mu'u la'o zoi Mikasuki zoi .i mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan ------=_Part_10636_29758850.1226510936202 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 5:34 PM, komfo,amonan <komfoamonan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
>>
>> On Monday 10 November 2008 13:50:47 komfo,amonan wrote:
>> > Smallish point: Is there any reason not to merge < gismu >, < lujvo >,
>> > and
>> > < fu'ivla > into < brivla >? The distinctions between those three seem
>> > not
>> > relevant to the stated purpose. { le do .arxokuna cu barkla di'u } works
>> > just as well, right?
>>
>> arxokuna ki'a? .i lumge'u java'i prokiono xu?
>
> go'i .i mi ca lo nu djica lo nu fanva cu pu facki fi no valsi be fi la
> lojban .i zvati pe'a la jbovlaste ji lo drata

 doi komfo,amonan .iki'u lo nu do finti zo arxokuna fi'o velji'i tu'a
la'o net. http://laxmahispajispaji.blogspot.com/2007_02_01_archive.html
net. kei do djuno lo du'u makau fo makau cu te fu'ivla .i ma joi ma du
la'edi'u

zo arxokuna fu'ivla fo zoi zoi aroughcun/arethkone/arehkan zoi noi ke'a valsi fi la'o zoi Powhatan zoi zi'e noi ke'a krasi zoi zoi raccoon zoi .i ra morsi pe'a bangu .i je la'a mi fu'irgau ei fi lo valsi be fi lo jmive pe'a bangu be mu'u la'o zoi Mikasuki zoi

.i mu'o mi'e komfo,amonan
------=_Part_10636_29758850.1226510936202-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.