From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Nov 16 12:40:39 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:40:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L1oQB-0001dZ-AM for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:40:39 -0800 Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.198.244]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1L1oQ7-0001d0-LR for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:40:39 -0800 Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b17so2369356rvf.46 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:40:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=jObd2wwifymN5py7bzDhyIFH+U32N4RuvgqHM4nFqhM=; b=ZWEdnwq6NN15iaoicqpHap4+2k8ePdOPlMYBTfpoRi0N+YS45mw0JL5j5azdMINnDe gJ5XEzgNECqqruQYYIUJuntnqcVN4rqh/l+T5+HpQ1unIZiL9a1SFXO/3KG7RSCITu34 FQ/wXDk/v6vBUjySGEoL0yTGedQgQDV+Gmthw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=JcIcs+WhJ+6xGnwM1Kj/m//FXZJeS+M3uuSFykMo6yE2XDpdoeqNB9T2Mt9KLie7Rj fjr4/ZzMgGepeqk1zlWhSjl5o2YBwavXIDn1t7ANWwYGnVGTJE41QkLXhq4txNE5xa8g bgMm/6qvmdPRRDUOMr9Z9PDD7UwJR0bXU2HLY= Received: by 10.140.166.16 with SMTP id o16mr1831079rve.25.1226868034338; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:40:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.194.15 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:40:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <925d17560811161240m3daa490ax5c998bde0ce32da2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:40:34 -0300 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?=" To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Annotated PEG grammar In-Reply-To: <737b61f30811161221r476aed32o1989aa1f1ebadedf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline References: <737b61f30811151245n352f23dala9685c894d991550@mail.gmail.com> <925d17560811161212p58b0e789mb61889dddc04c2ba@mail.gmail.com> <737b61f30811161221r476aed32o1989aa1f1ebadedf@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Score-Int: 0 X-Spam-Bar: / X-archive-position: 15046 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Chris Capel wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 14:12, Jorge Llambías wrote: >>>> gek-sentence <- gek subsentence gik subsentence tail-terms / tag? KE free* gek-sentence KEhE? free* / NA free* gek-sentence >> >> Perhaps point out why KE is used here at all. It's not needed to do >> any grouping, since gek already handles that by itself. I think the >> only reason is to separate "tag" from a possibe gek of form "tag GI" >> since otherwise "tag tag" could collapse into a single tag. > > I believe the other examples is when you have, e.g., four subsentences > all connected with geks and you want to group the middle two somehow. KE-KEhE is never needed with geks for grouping purposes. The case you give could be: ge broda gi (ga (go brode gi brodi) gi brodo) or ge (ga broda gi (go brode gi brodi)) gi brodo KE-KEhE wouldn't add anything.ether way. >>>> sumti-4 <- sumti-5 / gek sumti gik sumti-4 >> >> Do you think that > particular comment is noteworthy? I think it's worth keeping in mind that this rule connects different level of things so as to "fix" that if possible before making it official. mu'o mi'e xorxes To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.