From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Dec 22 15:39:11 2008
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:39:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1LEuMh-0003o4-R0	for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:39:11 -0800
Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.121])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <phma@phma.optus.nu>)	id 1LEuMU-0003ka-C2	for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:39:11 -0800
Received: from chausie ([71.75.215.96]) by cdptpa-omta05.mail.rr.com          with ESMTP          id <20081222233847.ZWEH18275.cdptpa-omta05.mail.rr.com@chausie>          for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 23:38:47 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39202E60	for <lojban-list@lojban.org>; Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:38:46 -0500 (EST)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
To: lojban-list@lojban.org
Subject: [lojban] Re: [lojban-beginners] Re: About the negators
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:38:44 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6
References: <101615.13333.qm@web81304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <925d17560812220909l1add6ea1p4298e5b90116ae0f@mail.gmail.com> <96f789a60812221054g74a68527md6eff452b258385b@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <96f789a60812221054g74a68527md6eff452b258385b@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200812221838.44679.phma@phma.optus.nu>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0
X-Spam-Score-Int: 0
X-Spam-Bar: /
X-archive-position: 15140
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org
X-list: lojban-list

On Monday 22 December 2008 13:54:25 Michael Turniansky wrote:
>   Okay, I agree that ko'a broda naku is the same as ko'a broda (if you move
> it leftwards, there is no funky qualifier or connective flipping to do
> (I've never seen it at the end of a bridi, but there is no reason why it
> couldn't be)).

As I understood it, {naku} is interpreted, in a bridi with no bridi-tail 
connectors, as if the selbri were at the end; i.e. the selbri is always in 
the scope of {naku}. So {ko'a broda naku} is equivalent to {ko'a naku broda}.

Pierre


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.