From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Thu Dec 25 02:01:45 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:01:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LFn2H-0002sI-I2 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:01:45 -0800 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LFn2H-0002sB-CK for lojban-list@lojban.org; Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:01:45 -0800 Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2008 02:01:45 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: gleki xisri'i Message-ID: <20081225100145.GI10930@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20081225043944.GA29775@sdf.lonestar.org> <20081225094052.GH10930@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081225094052.GH10930@digitalkingdom.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-archive-position: 15145 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 01:40:52AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote: > On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 04:39:46AM +0000, Minimiscience wrote: > > Regardless of how I developed it, my patch for the official > > grammar is available at > > and was > > made against the grammar at > > . > > I admit that there could be places in which constructs are > > parsed incorrectly, but this is based on my somewhat average > > understanding of Lojban grammar, and a half-right unambiguous > > fix to the parser should at least be a step in the right > > direction. > > You seem to be relying on yacc's %prec marker. I'd like some > evidence that this reduces to a CFG, please, because it sure > doesn't look that way to me. It looks like a yacc-specific trick. > Interesting, but definitely not a CFG solution for Lojban. It would also be helpful if you showed how to use this to build a working grammar, so I could play with it a bit. The source I'm using is the one at http://home.ccil.org/~cowan/parser-3.0.00.tar.gz The particular problem I'm having right now is that mkgramy generates qualified %token lines, but even fixing that doesn't seem to be helping. -Robin -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" -- http://shorl.com/tydruhedufogre http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.