From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Dec 26 14:52:19 2008 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 26 Dec 2008 14:52:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LGLXX-000057-Ry for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 14:52:19 -0800 Received: from mx.freeshell.org ([192.94.73.19] helo=sdf.lonestar.org ident=root) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LGLXQ-0008Ve-CM for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 14:52:19 -0800 Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:jwodder@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.4]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBQMprrM021303 for ; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:51:53 GMT Received: (from jwodder@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.2/8.12.8/Submit) id mBQMpq7C018049 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:51:52 GMT Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 22:51:52 +0000 From: Minimiscience To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: gleki xisri'i Message-ID: <20081226225151.GA28720@sdf.lonestar.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: SDF Public Access UNIX System User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: 2.2 X-Spam-Score-Int: 22 X-Spam-Bar: ++ X-archive-position: 15170 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: minimiscience@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list I have good news and bad news. The good news is that I got Cowan's parser to compile with my patch with a few tweaks. The complete patch is at ; just apply it to the source at and run `make`. Note that you need to be using version 2.4 of Bison; version 2.3 (at least the build that I have) doesn't accept assigning numeric values to %nonassoc tokens, in violation of the Yacc specification. The bad news is that the outputs from the respective programs differ for some constructs, and my version even chokes on two specific "{li'u}"s in openwm.txt for some reason that I can't yet work out. Regardless, I still feel that my underlying theory is sound, and a handful of careful edits to the grammar file should be all that's necessary to bring the programs into alignment. Now I just need to work out what those edits are. mu'omi'e la'o gy. Minimiscience .gy. -- ko na xalni To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.