From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Mar 04 15:46:58 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:46:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lf0ni-0008G4-1a for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:46:58 -0800 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lf0nh-0008Fx-U0 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:46:57 -0800 Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:46:57 -0800 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: syntax Message-ID: <20090304234657.GI27845@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <8CB6B36AEC9B389-918-CE6@webmail-db16.sysops.aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8CB6B36AEC9B389-918-CE6@webmail-db16.sysops.aol.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-archive-position: 15342 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 06:18:38PM -0500, thirderivative@aol.com wrote: > is there any lojbo who is familiar with syntax trees, x bar > theory, and phrase structure rules enough to have mapped out any > of that for lojban? Is there some way in which a formal grammar isn't a superset of all that? -Robin -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" -- http://shorl.com/tydruhedufogre http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.