From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Fri Apr 10 13:10:57 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LsN3x-0003SI-2E for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:10:57 -0700 Received: from rlpowell by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LsN3w-0003S4-G2 for lojban-list@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:10:56 -0700 Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:10:56 -0700 From: Robin Lee Powell To: lojban-list@lojban.org Subject: [lojban] Re: Wiki Copyleft? Message-ID: <20090410201056.GY27979@digitalkingdom.org> Mail-Followup-To: lojban-list@lojban.org References: <20090410073616.GS27979@digitalkingdom.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-archive-position: 15442 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >From all of the dozens of different authors, many of whom aren't around anymore? Good luck with that. For myself, I don't much like share-alike licenses, and would probably oppose any serious movement in that direction. In practice, I treat the content as public domain. We could put up a "by contributing, you agree to X" notice, the problem is all the extant content. -Robin On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 11:46:37AM -0400, Danny Piccirillo wrote: > Well it just seems appropriate. I'm all about the free culture movement and > free content. =] > > Could we get permission for the non-copyleft content to be copylefted? > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 03:36, Robin Lee Powell > wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 10:05:24AM -0400, Danny Piccirillo wrote: > > > Does the wiki use the GNU FDL or Crative Commons BY-SA? If not, > > > why not? And If so, it should be made more clear > > > > It's never come up. Much of the content actually predates the > > current wiki and was hosted by a different person on a different > > machine, and there was no license then, so even if we said their was > > one now, most of the content wouldn't be under it. > > > > What was it you were planning on doing that required this? > > > > -Robin > > > > -- > > They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." > > And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something > > other than the default outcome?" -- http://shorl.com/tydruhedufogre > > http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/*** > > http://www.lojban.org/ > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org > > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > > > > -- They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons." And I'm thinking: "Does it even occur to you to try for something other than the default outcome?" -- http://shorl.com/tydruhedufogre http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/ *** http://www.lojban.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.