From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Apr 29 04:16:45 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lz7mO-0008Lf-Tu for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:16:44 -0700 Received: from mail-ew0-f165.google.com ([209.85.219.165]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Lz7mL-0008LC-Cp for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:16:44 -0700 Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so1015644ewy.34 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:16:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B9MB6uQNuoc1zr1tU7srYUnDB/BD6LLt9ZFDfz0Znrg=; b=LVZtXpy+xn437zwDeS7u9cBQId3S0J2UVNrtIDGFG4Gk4LTERCG7qD2EOGV9/TqO0/ IGpPwFonxjqVelZTDxN7qDGkhWElHtrmGDcDBa6GEKhcWXxt5AapL7qQTW2DhQHRLOxd wATYBzcfNsJREkUkUxPo7+EIyB+kkoVwjPjSw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Ueb+MQNcBV6Kit+ivXC+e6KWBKa5Rg4s4kMPdtM8VxOcZ5czVVNHfDmDncV+REHs4I UhQ+rSS8fhJ74ugbNC3JraifZNGD42A1WUV38EBklRp2lftZLoY+PT+1+VSzCJ2qii4T WPlNCw9CoGyaOvH+xmKyF8gJn+7I3zhbJ4BLE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.61.2 with SMTP id j2mr224625eba.65.1241003794907; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:16:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:16:34 +0300 Message-ID: <5a3750120904290416t1996abf0qfea5e22ef2c8031a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: Logical Naming Conventions From: Oleksii Melnyk To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 15511 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lamelnyk@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list >How do all of you feel about naming The name should be globally unique "number" (like those found in passports, etc), in Bubble-Babble (or similar) encoding. Parts of it are "short" name for everyday use, still unique enough (if 2 or more syllables used "birthday problem" arises near 300 persons -- quite a big party). mi'e xolik-lyvyz-raxax mu'o do'u 2009/4/29, Danny Piccirillo : > Mm, true. That was really just a side concern to everything else which i'm > still not sure how i feel about. > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 23:39, wrote: > >> In a message dated 4/28/2009 23:06:07 Eastern Daylight Time, >> danny.piccirillo@gmail.com writes: >> >> >> Ah, that brings up another thing. Should names be 100% unique? That seems >> pretty impossible to me, but worth at least a moment of thought >> >> >> >> There is no reason or need for names to be unique, except as a personal >> preference, as in my case. I get by in my life just fine with my given >> name, and I don't personally know anyone else who has my name. Even my >> mother and one of my aunts, who share exactly the same name, don't have >> any >> problems with sharing their name. >> >> It's a problem only for the minority of people who are not satisfied with >> the name they have. >> >> Asking if names should be unique is implying that names should be forced >> on >> people. I vehemently object to anything like that. Names should be a >> matter of choice, of personal freedom. If you don't like your name, >> change >> it. As many times as you want. >> >> stevo > -- mu'o mi'e lex To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.