From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Wed Apr 29 10:40:34 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LzDlo-0007ru-9b for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:40:32 -0700 Received: from imr-d04.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.42]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LzDlY-0007nF-Lu for lojban-list@lojban.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:40:26 -0700 Received: from imo-da04.mx.aol.com (imo-da04.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.202]) by imr-d04.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id RELAYIN2-349f890be388; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:39:11 -0400 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-da04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v40_r1.5.) id d.ce4.518f4c97 (14502) for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:38:54 -0400 (EDT) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:38:54 EDT Subject: [lojban] Re: Logical Naming Conventions To: lojban-list@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_ce4.518f4c97.3729eaae_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 11501 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-IP: 205.188.169.202 X-archive-position: 15534 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --part1_ce4.518f4c97.3729eaae_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 4/29/2009 13:29:56 Eastern Daylight Time, danny.piccirillo@gmail.com writes: > Although my name has a history, it's meaning has mostly been lost, so i > put it in the same category as the many completely meaningless names out > there. So, do they all qualify as nonsense? > I'd still say no, since it's not a made-up name. It's a common name, part of the language in fact, not a nonce-name. stevo (not "Morpheme") --part1_ce4.518f4c97.3729eaae_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a messag= e dated 4/29/2009 13:29:56 Eastern Daylight Time, danny.piccirillo@gmail.c= om writes:


Although my name has= a history, it's meaning has mostly been lost, so i put it in the same cat= egory as the many completely meaningless names out there. So, do they all= qualify as nonsense?


I'd still say no, since it's not a made-up name.  It's a common= name, part of the language in fact, not a nonce-name.

stevo (not "Morpheme") --part1_ce4.518f4c97.3729eaae_boundary-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.