From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon May 18 13:57:39 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 18 May 2009 13:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M69ty-0002uR-I0 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 13:57:39 -0700 Received: from mail-gx0-f176.google.com ([209.85.217.176]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M69tu-0002td-UL for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 18 May 2009 13:57:38 -0700 Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so10616158gxk.10 for ; Mon, 18 May 2009 13:57:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=07fdL+tZTqhmqO9ty2LWdQBh3OjOHYhpLfHGlwsJVwY=; b=VDB+qU3pirLc/n+eQhvUhzhQ212Zd4idqOREir/Xup/VH+MU6ewJ/csx1FzIMRZGuv e+tJOBPCnWSaWCbyefDiAQGzpCc7/bkRK3m2HPXRtZJDBpXhzTW9xlkBb9RFOQxPxvSe 6RSXtkTe1fHBEs2oBIWiPkELeBt3dHnhIikC4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Jkfcdvx3OCoLpnEthWf0f/cx/zvQSy5S/1SzZf5ndgf05XDIpa7gFJtGKFIpfMwauA 1O/IKQOIBlWKGfJORNmNH3Qc4zXBPFpzfnQSwJJ9Nto0eRxl/LS07z2XUR6fjmQLE98Y 2TwA4U+6bL+dNmDuZYn9DS9scMBYUijSNgmn4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.122.6 with SMTP id z6mr13406388ybm.93.1242680238766; Mon, 18 May 2009 13:57:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A117DBB.4090204@perpetuum-immobile.de> References: <5715b9300905172256u62e5846bv835cb35e73451de4@mail.gmail.com> <4A117DBB.4090204@perpetuum-immobile.de> Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:57:18 -0400 Message-ID: <96f789a60905181357s6f276f30s42f574847bce778a@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: CLL fix? From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 15592 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mturniansky@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Timo Paulssen wrote: > Luke Bergen wrote: >> Has the translation of ".i ri" been fixed.  I'm still fairly new to lojban >> so if there is some case where ".i ri" actually does refer to the previous >> sentence could someone explain the difference between "ri" and "di'u"? >> > > obviously, the ri refers to dei, which means "this sentence", but seen from the > next sentence by the ri, it means "the previous sentence". > Except that "ri" should ignore "dei", which is a KOhA. See Chapter 7, above example 6.3. So, arguably, this example is in fact wrong. --gejyspa To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.