From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun May 24 06:25:24 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 24 May 2009 06:25:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M8Dhc-0008PB-CK for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 24 May 2009 06:25:24 -0700 Received: from col0-omc1-s15.col0.hotmail.com ([65.55.34.25]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M8DhW-0008OB-Id for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 24 May 2009 06:25:24 -0700 Received: from COL106-W13 ([65.55.34.8]) by col0-omc1-s15.col0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 24 May 2009 06:25:12 -0700 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_9cbea364-8f4b-48d4-b62c-1cc4cdaa9b95_" X-Originating-IP: [189.151.32.113] From: Oscar Lazo To: Subject: [lojban] Re: lojban-list Digest V8 #99 Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:25:12 -0500 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 May 2009 13:25:12.0078 (UTC) FILETIME=[10F792E0:01C9DC73] X-archive-position: 15607 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: geometricamente@hotmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --_9cbea364-8f4b-48d4-b62c-1cc4cdaa9b95_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I'm not sure a standard format is desirable. What if some sections are n= ot=20 > relevant to a given article? >=20 > As for checking each article for grammatical correctness=2C perhaps that'= s=20 > best done for each article individually. =20 Well=2C all wikipedias I know=2C (including the english wikipedia have a st= andard format)=2C what I'm suggesting is that we take advantage of the tool= s lojban provides to organize text: namely marking sections with "ni'o" and= "ni'oni'o...". As for relevant sections=2C it is not a bot's task to consi= der relevance=2C but merely to perform repetitive tasks. And although usual= ly that does not include checking grammar=2C in the case of lojban a bot co= uld warn the editors that their text doesn't parse. It would still be up to= the editors to decide whether they make any corrections though.=20 _________________________________________________________________ =BFYa actualizaste tu Perfil de Windows Live? www.actualizatuperfil.com.mx= --_9cbea364-8f4b-48d4-b62c-1cc4cdaa9b95_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >=3B I'm not sure a standard format is desirable. What if some sections = are not
>=3B relevant to a given article?
>=3B
>=3B As for= checking each article for grammatical correctness=2C perhaps that's
&g= t=3B best done for each article individually.

Well=2C all wikipedi= as I know=2C (including the english wikipedia have a standard format)=2C wh= at I'm suggesting is that we take advantage of the tools lojban provides to= organize text: namely marking sections with "ni'o" and "ni'oni'o...". As f= or relevant sections=2C it is not a bot's task to consider relevance=2C but= merely to perform repetitive tasks. And although usually that does not inc= lude checking grammar=2C in the case of lojban a bot could warn the editors= that their text doesn't parse. It would still be up to the editors to deci= de whether they make any corrections though.

Si no est=E1 e= n Windows Live nun= ca pas=F3. Actualiza tu Perfil = --_9cbea364-8f4b-48d4-b62c-1cc4cdaa9b95_-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.