From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sat Jun 13 08:14:07 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:14:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MFUvm-0007vH-E4 for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:14:06 -0700 Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com ([209.85.221.179]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MFUvf-0007uY-CE for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:14:06 -0700 Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so1468777qyk.28 for ; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:13:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pX5x9YIly1eY8IpNdSB56337xK4WwXYVKowRVtZluvQ=; b=wqYjC2/dZLWlcGh+7gDQTpeavmZLp3kbpABIU6Ux+2+Qwt+uz+Y2t8hymrdkbf2NUq eqZNp5guJ7qWdCzr4X1A52VoLvTwTMYPVkSULjijf7mj0PANz/l7pGCsbqmu+hvylAjo 5u59K/uRrkqmvOyW7fSIt51DDfPU90dzmWHus= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fpKlCaCvg1LNzqpOMFM7zID8FYn2+I84kcs+ZRe74QFKy9NVlxYwEL6is2F9o/q/de goilPYujyjlHS/dMMtkrgI2Tej6fsp+CKmacVNqe++PClbZ4hHwDXxU/Jb4TGWJ4VJFV r/Lsb48LazT+V0ybpdIL51c1T3whgg0uezTO4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.45.198 with SMTP id g6mr4029527vcf.34.1244906030880; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:13:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200906122051.41101.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <5715b9300906121722g561ebf1g3b517aac25d644b7@mail.gmail.com> <200906122051.41101.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:13:50 -0400 Message-ID: <5715b9300906130813q3e3503aft857446b01200e40d@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: nei From: Luke Bergen To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b85b0bfdae4046c3c4530 X-archive-position: 15660 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list --0016363b85b0bfdae4046c3c4530 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit yes. that's exactly what I was going for. I was looking for something like: "I like the strangeness of [nei]" which I was hoping that if nei works the way I am thinking that it does that would mean: "I like the strangeness of 'I like the strangeness of '...' ' " sort of having a "the song that never ends" effect. Or does "nei" not get included in "the current bridi"? - Luke Bergen On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Friday 12 June 2009 20:22:38 Luke Bergen wrote: > > so I just stumbled across "nei" in my readings. It seems like some > > fun mischief can be had here... > > > > mi nelci lo te cizra be fa nei > > > > Or does "nei" not include "nei" in the repeated bridi? > > "lo broda be fa co'e" is equivalent to "co'e poi broda"; you're > stuffing "co'e" in x1, then taking x1 as a sumti. So what you said means > "mi > nelci nei poi te cizra", that is, the bridi is a strange property. Is that > what you meant? > > Pierre > > > To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org > with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if > you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help. > > --0016363b85b0bfdae4046c3c4530 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable yes.=A0 that's exactly what I was going for.=A0 I was looking for somet= hing like:

"I like the strangeness of [nei]" which I was h= oping that if nei works the way I am thinking that it does that would mean:=
"I like the strangeness of 'I like the strangeness of '...'= ; ' "
sort of having a "the song that never ends" eff= ect.

Or does "nei" not get included in "the current b= ridi"?

- Luke Bergen


On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Pierre = Abbat <phma@phma= .optus.nu> wrote:
On Friday 12 June 2009 20:22:38 Luke Berg= en wrote:
> so I just stumbled across "nei" in my readings. =A0It seems = like some
> fun mischief can be had here...
>
> mi nelci lo te cizra be fa nei
>
> Or does "nei" not include "nei" in the repeated br= idi?

"lo broda be fa co'e" is equivalent to "co&#= 39;e poi broda"; you're
stuffing "co'e" in x1, then taking x1 as a sumti. So what you= said means "mi
nelci nei poi te cizra", that is, the bridi is a strange property. Is = that
what you meant?

Pierre


To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org
with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if
you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.


--0016363b85b0bfdae4046c3c4530-- To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.