From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Sun Jun 28 07:33:15 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:33:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MKvRS-0006oQ-HH for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:33:14 -0700 Received: from web88002.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.189]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MKvRL-0006mo-0s for lojban-list@lojban.org; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:33:14 -0700 Received: (qmail 31769 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Jun 2009 14:32:59 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1246199579; bh=onCqmgJL97CF8U9ppwRlK667YQAaKRYI79/jqHEN6N8=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ur1MEbfyMaopx++k39kUohzJzaV2kMfXqZycJ8xh7IGzO2Xh9l6u4rcfHFDD9tZwdm8bep8F9HoLYSN/uwvwvZemrSMEgQKxp3KDwE7xvNOlZmiyGM9q3uoEr+L/LCRQgyOyQMKoCuR77dMtQCibUOxCF1JeJgo1ylYCU1tpIA0= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=X83rP6IueDSxJIZURVoDNzLNSR2SAjl0zzmeszrMpDnCytZbPCR+kn1aCVQcPtUT+iZW15ck6GngilZ4UHO4RWT/tSMq4p87ln2pMcjiaUhCJTPE7bCq6RUvFroAB93Aeqc1/FKoxh9oS6SvrY/38DdJG3OKnFO/5r4cvAj9ESI=; Message-ID: <201547.31575.qm@web88002.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 4ywLqhcVM1k0yKYydFv5JzG83rNUbAZAlPX4_WUNwRBphOjOATPR9kE1AhAFMAhXaHjAbwa5j0NFbDDkIqX1XG5pPFH5vk50LonPF6dVFYTcMFNkM3GAH.Mtef6C_0lrZufOlcbZ4S2Xuo6jWIlK6L0pkRJna_LxUtKsp3QPEDsfCqA5KTcos6FI8XameRabfgwLsBD9TpWLxlL39sLtcE3fdqnbIADGj6ezfApcvu1Gy3XcfkRUPLLaYSKNAfMSeW5s4g-- Received: from [99.229.170.85] by web88002.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:32:58 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/1277.43 YahooMailWebService/0.7.289.10 References: <4de8c3930906260535k4c4f2f4uafe614261bac6389@mail.gmail.com> <96f789a60906261308t6098203eld2fb4cabe3e6d72b@mail.gmail.com> <218000.89725.qm@web88005.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <96f789a60906280319k2dfce1dey577a8fb244fe214f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:32:58 -0700 (PDT) From: "A. PIEKARSKI" Subject: [lojban] Re: xenru be tu'a la maikl.djaksn. xatra To: lojban-list@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <96f789a60906280319k2dfce1dey577a8fb244fe214f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 15706 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: totus@rogers.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list > > > > > >> > >> > .i mi nu tai jmive kei nelci > >> > (I like livin' this way) > >> > >> > >>  That one is fine > > > > > > Why not: .i mi lo nu tai jmive kei nelci > > > > What's the rule for dropping {lo}? > > > >   His is a tanru, "I in-unspecified-form living-type like" >   Yours is a two sumti utterance -- "I like an unspecifed form of living" > I guess I should have used {le} in my question, not {lo}. Is there any difference in meaning?  If not, it's interesting that leaving out or keeping {le} has no effect on the meaning.  That musty be unsual. mu'o mi'e andrus To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.