From nobody@digitalkingdom.org Mon Jun 29 04:10:56 2009 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list lojban-list); Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MLElD-0005DW-FU for lojban-list-real@lojban.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:10:55 -0700 Received: from mail-gx0-f227.google.com ([209.85.217.227]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MLEl3-0005CU-Dy for lojban-list@lojban.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:10:54 -0700 Received: by gxk27 with SMTP id 27so14940722gxk.10 for ; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:10:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rxymdAC+pgjASNpWvRzW9s7fxSLnlY4vZz/BOQK2GTM=; b=lxzFA7c3wb9865xN0ACpgUktJAfbaNHqo6Q/KDrVdECAHLlr+95O0FKHMPAwgulNBo ZI/L6VH6WQSrllC+2jLqFPFbvSPp6btzC1Tj3fCn+NDK5nHNjtmKpKNYGhW6pV5DGB1T CEaXl4EGW6uq/vbtwccpPQo/LGqUjk/l+L8Yc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=P2HBW1oxt41dcEqCeaXcrLQH9LKaR3CC7tWjm5pgAQWtn3mJCazvx5HF+FSbvo2lo5 446malf7o+24cfPc5vVqf6HQ45fL4+wepF7QG2wt+a0mM1Ag87n8qDSH7/sFMPWWMo4S l6WJU+26RP8huPN2C2JN7Snq64q9rr3Sz/e2w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.51.6 with SMTP id y6mr4028856yby.197.1246273839294; Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:10:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201547.31575.qm@web88002.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <4de8c3930906260535k4c4f2f4uafe614261bac6389@mail.gmail.com> <96f789a60906261308t6098203eld2fb4cabe3e6d72b@mail.gmail.com> <218000.89725.qm@web88005.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <96f789a60906280319k2dfce1dey577a8fb244fe214f@mail.gmail.com> <201547.31575.qm@web88002.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:10:39 -0400 Message-ID: <96f789a60906290410q62b7fdb9x6fcf433ad258db1b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [lojban] Re: xenru be tu'a la maikl.djaksn. xatra From: Michael Turniansky To: lojban-list@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-archive-position: 15707 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: lojban-list-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mturniansky@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: lojban-list@lojban.org X-list: lojban-list On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 10:32 AM, A. PIEKARSKI wrote: > >> >> >> >> > .i mi nu tai jmive kei nelci >> >> > (I like livin' this way) >> >> >> >> >> >>  That one is fine >> > >> > >> > Why not: .i mi lo nu tai jmive kei nelci >> > >> > What's the rule for dropping {lo}? >> > >> >>   His is a tanru, "I in-unspecified-form living-type like" >>   Yours is a two sumti utterance -- "I like an unspecifed form of living" >> > I guess I should have used {le} in my question, not {lo}. > Is there any difference in meaning?  If not, it's interesting that leaving out > or keeping {le} has no effect on the meaning.  That musty be unsual. > Yeah, you're right, "le" would have been better, since it's particularly that type of living that you have been describing that you like, not just any living. --gejyspa To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to lojban-list-request@lojban.org with the subject unsubscribe, or go to http://www.lojban.org/lsg2/, or if you're really stuck, send mail to secretary@lojban.org for help.